CMBT vs. QQQH

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Cmb.Tech NV (CMBT) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH).

QQQH is managed by Neos. It was launched on Dec 19, 2019.

Performance

CMBT vs. QQQH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cmb.Tech NV (CMBT) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CMBT vs. QQQH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
CMBT Cmb.Tech NV	31.76%	-2.30%	-35.19%	17.73%	93.21%	12.61%	-24.34%	4.15%
QQQH NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF	-2.89%	14.17%	25.98%	30.96%	-28.35%	9.76%	18.62%	0.31%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMBT achieves a 31.76% return, which is significantly higher than QQQH's -2.89% return.

CMBT

• 1D: 1.77%
• 1M: -14.58%
• YTD: 31.76%
• 6M: 36.14%
• 1Y: 40.79%
• 3Y*: -0.16%
• 5Y*: 13.07%
• 10Y*: 9.57%

QQQH

• 1D: 0.61%
• 1M: -2.69%
• YTD: -2.89%
• 6M: -1.20%
• 1Y: 15.34%
• 3Y*: 19.08%
• 5Y*: 7.57%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CMBT vs. QQQH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMBT

CMBT Risk / Return Rank: 72
CMBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
CMBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
CMBT Omega Ratio Rank: 63
CMBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
CMBT Martin Ratio Rank: 76

QQQH

QQQH Risk / Return Rank: 65
QQQH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
QQQH Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
QQQH Omega Ratio Rank: 63
QQQH Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
QQQH Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMBT vs. QQQH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cmb.Tech NV (CMBT) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CMBT	QQQH	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.96	1.05	-0.09
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.56	1.61	-0.04
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.24	-0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.01	1.78	+0.23
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.93	8.30	-3.37
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CMBT vs. QQQH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMBT Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is comparable to the QQQH Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMBT and QQQH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CMBT	QQQH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96	1.05	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.31	0.57	-0.26
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.23	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.18	0.66	-0.48

Correlation

The correlation between CMBT and QQQH is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CMBT vs. QQQH - Dividend Comparison

CMBT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, less than QQQH's 9.43% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CMBT Cmb.Tech NV	0.79%	0.52%	25.18%	12.23%	0.70%	1.35%	20.75%	0.96%	1.73%	3.03%	17.23%	6.35%
QQQH NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF	9.43%	8.86%	7.53%	7.18%	9.05%	7.77%	7.48%	0.65%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

CMBT vs. QQQH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMBT drawdown since its inception was -57.21%, which is greater than QQQH's maximum drawdown of -31.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMBT and QQQH.

Drawdown Indicators

	CMBT	QQQH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.21%	-31.24%	-25.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.70%	-8.87%	-10.83%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-57.21%	-31.24%	-25.97%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-57.21%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-30.41%	-4.37%	-26.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.31%	-8.48%	-16.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.02%	1.90%	+6.12%

Volatility

CMBT vs. QQQH - Volatility Comparison

Cmb.Tech NV (CMBT) has a higher volatility of 12.29% compared to NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH) at 4.49%. This indicates that CMBT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CMBT	QQQH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.29%	4.49%	+7.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	27.91%	8.37%	+19.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	42.87%	14.74%	+28.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	42.58%	13.40%	+29.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.86%	13.51%	+27.35%