PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MNTK vs. UTL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MNTK vs. UTL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Montauk Renewables, Inc. (MNTK) and Unitil Corporation (UTL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MNTK achieves a 2.40% return, which is significantly lower than UTL's 4.03% return.


MNTK

1D
-4.47%
1M
22.14%
YTD
2.40%
6M
4.91%
1Y
-1.72%
3Y*
-38.19%
5Y*
-29.90%
10Y*

UTL

1D
1.69%
1M
-3.71%
YTD
4.03%
6M
0.87%
1Y
-6.17%
3Y*
0.58%
5Y*
0.60%
10Y*
5.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MNTK vs. UTL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
MNTK
Montauk Renewables, Inc.
2.40%-58.04%-55.33%-19.22%7.61%-12.62%
UTL
Unitil Corporation
4.03%-7.43%6.33%5.63%15.04%17.47%

Correlation

The correlation between MNTK and UTL is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2021

0.15

Fundamentals

EPS

MNTK:

$0.02

UTL:

$3.26

PE Ratio

MNTK:

82.78

UTL:

15.19

PEG Ratio

MNTK:

0.67

UTL:

2.49

PS Ratio

MNTK:

1.02

UTL:

1.46

Total Revenue (TTM)

MNTK:

$180.21M

UTL:

$582.10M

Gross Profit (TTM)

MNTK:

$51.29M

UTL:

$338.90M

EBITDA (TTM)

MNTK:

$36.19M

UTL:

$207.70M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Montauk Renewables, Inc.

Unitil Corporation

Return for Risk

MNTK vs. UTL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MNTK
MNTK Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
MNTK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MNTK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
MNTK Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
MNTK Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
MNTK Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

UTL
UTL Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
UTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
UTL Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
UTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
UTL Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MNTK vs. UTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Montauk Renewables, Inc. (MNTK) and Unitil Corporation (UTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MNTKUTLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.02

-0.29

+0.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.56

-0.25

+0.81

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

0.97

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.12

-0.37

+0.25

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.20

-0.76

+0.56

MNTK vs. UTL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MNTK Sharpe Ratio is -0.02, which is higher than the UTL Sharpe Ratio of -0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MNTK and UTL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MNTKUTLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

-0.29

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.41

0.02

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.41

0.36

-0.77

Drawdowns

MNTK vs. UTL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNTK drawdown since its inception was -94.49%, which is greater than UTL's maximum drawdown of -48.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNTK and UTL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MNTKUTLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.49%

-48.37%

-46.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-58.67%

-17.06%

-41.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-89.61%

-25.84%

-63.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-94.49%

-28.26%

-66.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-91.58%

-15.85%

-75.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-57.24%

-11.06%

-46.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

35.17%

8.41%

+26.76%

Volatility

MNTK vs. UTL - Volatility Comparison

Montauk Renewables, Inc. (MNTK) has a higher volatility of 25.09% compared to Unitil Corporation (UTL) at 7.73%. This indicates that MNTK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UTL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MNTKUTLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.09%

7.73%

+17.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

49.73%

15.46%

+34.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

78.90%

21.51%

+57.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

72.80%

25.04%

+47.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

73.37%

27.23%

+46.14%

Dividends

MNTK vs. UTL - Dividend Comparison

MNTK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MNTK
Montauk Renewables, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UTL
Unitil Corporation
3.74%3.72%3.14%3.08%3.04%3.31%3.39%2.39%2.88%3.16%3.13%3.90%

Financials

MNTK vs. UTL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Montauk Renewables, Inc. and Unitil Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M20222023202420252026
46.43M
216.90M
(MNTK) Total Revenue
(UTL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MNTK vs. UTL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Montauk Renewables, Inc. and Unitil Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%202220232024202520260
89.2%
Portfolio components
MNTK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Montauk Renewables, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 46.43M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

UTL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Unitil Corporation reported a gross profit of 193.50M and revenue of 216.90M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 89.2%.

MNTK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Montauk Renewables, Inc. reported an operating income of -1.60M and revenue of 46.43M, resulting in an operating margin of -3.4%.

UTL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Unitil Corporation reported an operating income of 55.90M and revenue of 216.90M, resulting in an operating margin of 25.8%.

MNTK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Montauk Renewables, Inc. reported a net income of 5.00K and revenue of 46.43M, resulting in a net margin of 0.0%.

UTL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Unitil Corporation reported a net income of 33.20M and revenue of 216.90M, resulting in a net margin of 15.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MNTK and UTL have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MNTK has higher volatility (25.09%) compared to UTL (7.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MNTK dropped -94.49% vs UTL's -48.37%.

MNTK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.02 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MNTK and UTL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer