MNST vs. EL
MNST (Monster Beverage Corporation) and EL (The Estee Lauder Companies Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Defensive sector — MNST in Beverages - Non-Alcoholic, EL in Household & Personal Products. Over the past 10 years, MNST returned 13.79%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for EL. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MNST vs. EL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MNST achieves a 21.08% return, which is significantly higher than EL's -13.76% return. Over the past 10 years, MNST has outperformed EL with an annualized return of 13.79%, while EL has yielded a comparatively lower 1.09% annualized return.
MNST
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 6.59%
- YTD
- 21.08%
- 6M
- 25.50%
- 1Y
- 47.21%
- 3Y*
- 16.85%
- 5Y*
- 14.70%
- 10Y*
- 13.79%
EL
- 1D
- 1.89%
- 1M
- 12.14%
- YTD
- -13.76%
- 6M
- -13.25%
- 1Y
- 35.19%
- 3Y*
- -19.92%
- 5Y*
- -20.28%
- 10Y*
- 1.09%
MNST vs. EL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNST Monster Beverage Corporation | 21.08% | 45.87% | -8.77% | 13.48% | 5.72% | 3.85% | 45.52% | 29.11% | -22.23% | 42.74% |
EL The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. | -13.76% | 42.13% | -47.59% | -40.13% | -32.31% | 40.03% | 29.77% | 60.34% | 3.38% | 68.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between MNST and EL is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 1995 | 0.24 |
The correlation between MNST and EL shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (1 year) to 0.37 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MNST:
$91.74B
EL:
$32.77B
MNST:
$2.06
EL:
-$0.68
MNST:
10.41
EL:
2.20
MNST:
10.51
EL:
8.21
MNST:
$8.79B
EL:
$14.84B
MNST:
$4.88B
EL:
$11.09B
MNST:
$2.70B
EL:
$1.30B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MNST vs. EL — Risk / Return Rank
MNST
EL
MNST vs. EL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) and The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. (EL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MNST | EL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.15 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.60 | 0.69 | +1.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.37 | 1.66 | +5.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MNST vs. EL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNST drawdown since its inception was -69.17%, smaller than the maximum EL drawdown of -85.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNST and EL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MNST | EL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.17% | -85.82% | +16.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.70% | -43.62% | +25.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.04% | -74.55% | +48.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.62% | -85.82% | +59.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.42% | -85.82% | +55.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -74.09% | +74.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.66% | -20.74% | +0.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.22% | 18.12% | -11.90% |
Volatility
MNST vs. EL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) is 5.50%, while The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. (EL) has a volatility of 15.86%. This indicates that MNST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MNST | EL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.50% | 15.86% | -10.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.03% | 38.87% | -18.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.43% | 48.31% | -21.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.60% | 43.35% | -18.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.25% | 36.60% | -10.35% |
Dividends
MNST vs. EL - Dividend Comparison
MNST has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EL The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. | 1.56% | 1.34% | 3.11% | 1.81% | 0.99% | 0.59% | 0.56% | 0.86% | 1.21% | 1.10% | 1.62% | 1.16% |
MNST Monster Beverage Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
MNST vs. EL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Monster Beverage Corporation and The Estee Lauder Companies Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MNST vs. EL - Profitability Comparison
MNST - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Monster Beverage Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.29B and revenue of 2.35B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.0%.
EL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.84B and revenue of 3.71B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 76.4%.
MNST - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Monster Beverage Corporation reported an operating income of 729.96M and revenue of 2.35B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.0%.
EL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. reported an operating income of 249.00M and revenue of 3.71B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.7%.
MNST - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Monster Beverage Corporation reported a net income of 569.49M and revenue of 2.35B, resulting in a net margin of 24.2%.
EL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. reported a net income of 89.00M and revenue of 3.71B, resulting in a net margin of 2.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MNST and EL have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EL has higher volatility (15.86%) compared to MNST (5.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MNST dropped -69.17% vs EL's -85.82%.
MNST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 0.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MNST and EL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer