MNST vs. DLLL
MNST (Monster Beverage Corporation) is a stock, while DLLL (GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF) is Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dell Technologies Inc. (DELL). Over the past year, MNST returned 48.22% vs 765.95% for DLLL. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
MNST vs. DLLL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MNST achieves a 22.20% return, which is significantly lower than DLLL's 762.51% return.
MNST
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- 7.95%
- YTD
- 22.20%
- 6M
- 20.63%
- 1Y
- 48.22%
- 3Y*
- 16.59%
- 5Y*
- 15.76%
- 10Y*
- 13.87%
DLLL
- 1D
- 4.21%
- 1M
- 89.37%
- YTD
- 762.51%
- 6M
- 738.64%
- 1Y
- 765.95%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MNST vs. DLLL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MNST Monster Beverage Corporation | 22.20% | 59.17% |
DLLL GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF | 762.51% | -3.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between MNST and DLLL is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2025 | -0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MNST vs. DLLL — Risk / Return Rank
MNST
DLLL
MNST vs. DLLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) and GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF (DLLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MNST | DLLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.56 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.74 | 13.52 | -10.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.83 | 27.52 | -19.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MNST vs. DLLL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNST drawdown since its inception was -69.17%, roughly equal to the maximum DLLL drawdown of -68.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNST and DLLL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MNST | DLLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.17% | -68.58% | -0.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.70% | -57.19% | +39.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.04% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -18.41% | +18.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.65% | -25.86% | +5.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.18% | 28.05% | -21.87% |
Volatility
MNST vs. DLLL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Monster Beverage Corporation (MNST) is 4.88%, while GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF (DLLL) has a volatility of 66.89%. This indicates that MNST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DLLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MNST | DLLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.88% | 66.89% | -62.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.86% | 102.56% | -82.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.37% | 131.00% | -104.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.62% | 129.67% | -105.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.25% | 129.67% | -103.42% |
Dividends
MNST vs. DLLL - Dividend Comparison
Neither MNST nor DLLL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
MNST and DLLL have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DLLL has higher volatility (66.89%) compared to MNST (4.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MNST dropped -69.17% vs DLLL's -68.58%.
DLLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.91 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MNST and DLLL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer