DLLL vs. MVLL
DLLL (GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF) and MVLL (GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from GraniteShares - DLLL tracks the Dell Technologies Inc. (DELL) while MVLL tracks the Marvell Technology Inc. (MRVL). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, DLLL returned 711.11% vs 797.95% for MVLL. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 1.50% expense ratio.
Performance
DLLL vs. MVLL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DLLL achieves a 727.68% return, which is significantly lower than MVLL's 776.39% return.
DLLL
- 1D
- 4.40%
- 1M
- 81.72%
- YTD
- 727.68%
- 6M
- 718.40%
- 1Y
- 711.11%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MVLL
- 1D
- -2.53%
- 1M
- 102.27%
- YTD
- 776.39%
- 6M
- 776.25%
- 1Y
- 797.95%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DLLL vs. MVLL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DLLL GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF | 727.68% | 39.80% |
MVLL GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF | 776.39% | -8.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between DLLL and MVLL is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2025 | 0.50 |
DLLL vs. MVLL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DLLL
MVLL
Technology
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
DLLL
MVLL
Basic Materials
DLLL
-
MVLL
-
Communication Services
DLLL
-
MVLL
-
Consumer Cyclical
DLLL
-
MVLL
-
Consumer Defensive
DLLL
-
MVLL
-
Energy
DLLL
-
MVLL
-
Financial Services
DLLL
-
MVLL
-
Healthcare
DLLL
-
MVLL
-
Industrials
DLLL
-
MVLL
-
Real Estate
DLLL
-
MVLL
-
Utilities
DLLL
-
MVLL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DLLL vs. MVLL — Risk / Return Rank
DLLL
MVLL
DLLL vs. MVLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF (DLLL) and GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF (MVLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DLLL | MVLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.53 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 12.55 | 16.47 | -3.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 25.57 | 33.38 | -7.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DLLL vs. MVLL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DLLL drawdown since its inception was -68.58%, which is greater than MVLL's maximum drawdown of -59.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DLLL and MVLL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DLLL | MVLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.58% | -59.02% | -9.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -57.19% | -48.93% | -8.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.71% | -15.10% | -6.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.88% | -22.37% | -3.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.02% | 24.09% | +3.93% |
Volatility
DLLL vs. MVLL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GraniteShares 2x Long DELL Daily ETF (DLLL) is 66.98%, while GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF (MVLL) has a volatility of 83.43%. This indicates that DLLL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MVLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DLLL | MVLL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 66.98% | 83.43% | -16.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 103.02% | 111.00% | -7.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 131.23% | 144.07% | -12.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 129.83% | 146.42% | -16.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 129.83% | 146.42% | -16.59% |
DLLL vs. MVLL - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both DLLL and MVLL have an expense ratio of 1.50%.
Dividends
DLLL vs. MVLL - Dividend Comparison
Neither DLLL nor MVLL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
DLLL and MVLL have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MVLL has higher volatility (83.43%) compared to DLLL (66.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DLLL dropped -68.58% vs MVLL's -59.02%.
On 1-year performance, MVLL leads with 797.95% vs 711.11% for DLLL. Both ETFs have the same 1.50% expense ratio. On volatility, DLLL has been the lower-risk option at 66.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MVLL has performed better with a 797.95% return vs 711.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DLLL and MVLL have the same expense ratio: 1.50% per year.
DLLL and MVLL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
DLLL tracks Dell Technologies Inc. (DELL), while MVLL tracks Marvell Technology Inc. (MRVL).
MVLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.60 vs 5.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DLLL and MVLL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer