PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MNHYX vs. EXBAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MNHYX vs. EXBAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series (MNHYX) and Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Moderate Term Series (EXBAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MNHYX achieves a 2.47% return, which is significantly higher than EXBAX's 0.83% return. Over the past 10 years, MNHYX has outperformed EXBAX with an annualized return of 6.62%, while EXBAX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.47% annualized return.


MNHYX

1D
-0.20%
1M
0.63%
YTD
2.47%
6M
3.36%
1Y
7.99%
3Y*
9.34%
5Y*
5.58%
10Y*
6.62%

EXBAX

1D
-0.48%
1M
0.97%
YTD
0.83%
6M
1.43%
1Y
6.69%
3Y*
7.08%
5Y*
2.60%
10Y*
5.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MNHYX vs. EXBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MNHYX
Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series
2.47%6.65%9.63%13.19%-7.59%9.99%6.26%13.99%-1.30%8.49%
EXBAX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Moderate Term Series
0.83%9.29%6.11%11.13%-14.52%7.97%14.96%16.15%-3.54%11.59%

Correlation

The correlation between MNHYX and EXBAX is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2009

0.45

The correlation between MNHYX and EXBAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (all time) to 0.61 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MNHYX vs. EXBAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MNHYX
MNHYX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
MNHYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MNHYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
MNHYX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
MNHYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
MNHYX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

EXBAX
EXBAX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
EXBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EXBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
EXBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
EXBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
EXBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MNHYX vs. EXBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series (MNHYX) and Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Moderate Term Series (EXBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MNHYXEXBAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.70

1.19

+0.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.29

1.01

+2.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.76

4.01

+10.75

MNHYX vs. EXBAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MNHYX Sharpe Ratio is 3.01, which is higher than the EXBAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MNHYX and EXBAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MNHYXEXBAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.01

1.08

+1.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.52

0.34

+1.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.60

0.72

+0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.83

0.47

+1.37

Drawdowns

MNHYX vs. EXBAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNHYX drawdown since its inception was -19.70%, smaller than the maximum EXBAX drawdown of -29.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNHYX and EXBAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MNHYXEXBAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.70%

-29.86%

+10.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.51%

-7.37%

+4.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.43%

-7.52%

+3.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.84%

-19.23%

+8.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.70%

-19.23%

-0.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

-1.42%

+1.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.56%

-5.06%

+3.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.56%

1.86%

-1.30%

Volatility

MNHYX vs. EXBAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series (MNHYX) is 0.79%, while Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Moderate Term Series (EXBAX) has a volatility of 2.11%. This indicates that MNHYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EXBAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MNHYXEXBAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.79%

2.11%

-1.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.13%

5.64%

-3.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.74%

6.91%

-4.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.70%

7.59%

-3.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.15%

7.66%

-3.51%

MNHYX vs. EXBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MNHYX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than EXBAX's 1.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

MNHYX vs. EXBAX - Dividend Comparison

MNHYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.66%, more than EXBAX's 5.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EXBAX
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Moderate Term Series
5.72%5.77%4.57%2.27%0.99%6.67%6.31%4.83%5.08%6.09%1.81%0.58%
MNHYX
Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series
6.66%6.95%6.38%6.66%5.93%7.93%4.98%6.63%5.26%5.16%6.49%5.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


MNHYX and EXBAX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EXBAX has higher volatility (2.11%) compared to MNHYX (0.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MNHYX dropped -19.70% vs EXBAX's -29.86%.

MNHYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.01 vs 1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MNHYX and EXBAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer