MNHYX vs. CBLDX
Compare and contrast key facts about Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series (MNHYX) and CrossingBridge Low Duration High Yield Fund (CBLDX).
MNHYX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Sep 14, 2009. CBLDX is managed by CrossingBridge. It was launched on Jan 30, 2018.
Performance
MNHYX vs. CBLDX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MNHYX vs. CBLDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNHYX Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series | -1.11% | 6.65% | 9.63% | 13.19% | -7.59% | 9.99% | 6.26% | 13.99% | -1.69% |
CBLDX CrossingBridge Low Duration High Yield Fund | 0.46% | 6.04% | 7.11% | 7.71% | 0.66% | 7.44% | 3.59% | 3.50% | 1.67% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MNHYX achieves a -1.11% return, which is significantly lower than CBLDX's 0.46% return.
MNHYX
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- -1.86%
- YTD
- -1.11%
- 6M
- 0.19%
- 1Y
- 4.70%
- 3Y*
- 8.57%
- 5Y*
- 5.31%
- 10Y*
- 6.59%
CBLDX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.31%
- YTD
- 0.46%
- 6M
- 1.42%
- 1Y
- 5.06%
- 3Y*
- 6.56%
- 5Y*
- 5.12%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MNHYX vs. CBLDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MNHYX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than CBLDX's 0.88% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MNHYX vs. CBLDX — Risk / Return Rank
MNHYX
CBLDX
MNHYX vs. CBLDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series (MNHYX) and CrossingBridge Low Duration High Yield Fund (CBLDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MNHYX | CBLDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.24 | 3.52 | -2.29 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.64 | 5.05 | -3.41 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 2.08 | -0.80 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.23 | 5.45 | -4.22 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.86 | 25.00 | -20.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MNHYX | CBLDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.24 | 3.52 | -2.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.46 | 3.27 | -1.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.79 | 2.55 | -0.76 |
Correlation
The correlation between MNHYX and CBLDX is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
MNHYX vs. CBLDX - Dividend Comparison
MNHYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.93%, more than CBLDX's 6.27% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNHYX Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series | 6.93% | 6.95% | 6.38% | 6.66% | 5.93% | 7.93% | 4.98% | 6.63% | 5.26% | 5.16% | 6.49% | 5.60% |
CBLDX CrossingBridge Low Duration High Yield Fund | 6.27% | 6.43% | 7.12% | 7.65% | 5.07% | 5.13% | 3.97% | 2.85% | 2.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
MNHYX vs. CBLDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNHYX drawdown since its inception was -19.70%, which is greater than CBLDX's maximum drawdown of -8.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNHYX and CBLDX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MNHYX | CBLDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.70% | -8.15% | -11.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.38% | -0.93% | -2.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.84% | -1.88% | -8.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.20% | -0.62% | -1.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.57% | -0.31% | -1.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.86% | 0.20% | +0.66% |
Volatility
MNHYX vs. CBLDX - Volatility Comparison
Manning & Napier High Yield Bond Series (MNHYX) has a higher volatility of 1.50% compared to CrossingBridge Low Duration High Yield Fund (CBLDX) at 0.65%. This indicates that MNHYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBLDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MNHYX | CBLDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.50% | 0.65% | +0.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.06% | 1.11% | +0.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.66% | 1.45% | +2.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.66% | 1.57% | +2.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.15% | 1.83% | +2.32% |