MNDFX vs. RIDAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series (MNDFX) and The Income Fund of America Class R-1 (RIDAX).
MNDFX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Nov 7, 2008. RIDAX is an actively managed fund by American Funds. It was launched on Dec 1, 1973.
Performance
MNDFX vs. RIDAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MNDFX vs. RIDAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNDFX Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series | 5.01% | 15.76% | 11.60% | 5.64% | -4.22% | 22.45% | 2.44% | -28.95% | -4.30% | 23.39% |
RIDAX The Income Fund of America Class R-1 | 1.29% | 16.83% | 9.49% | 6.16% | -7.14% | 16.47% | 3.68% | 17.57% | -6.06% | 11.86% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MNDFX achieves a 5.01% return, which is significantly higher than RIDAX's 1.29% return. Over the past 10 years, MNDFX has underperformed RIDAX with an annualized return of 4.78%, while RIDAX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.35% annualized return.
MNDFX
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- -4.75%
- YTD
- 5.01%
- 6M
- 9.90%
- 1Y
- 17.82%
- 3Y*
- 12.93%
- 5Y*
- 8.77%
- 10Y*
- 4.78%
RIDAX
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -5.77%
- YTD
- 1.29%
- 6M
- 3.84%
- 1Y
- 13.29%
- 3Y*
- 10.98%
- 5Y*
- 7.05%
- 10Y*
- 7.35%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MNDFX vs. RIDAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MNDFX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than RIDAX's 1.36% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MNDFX vs. RIDAX — Risk / Return Rank
MNDFX
RIDAX
MNDFX vs. RIDAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series (MNDFX) and The Income Fund of America Class R-1 (RIDAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MNDFX | RIDAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.15 | 1.46 | -0.30 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.65 | 2.01 | -0.36 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.30 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.41 | 1.58 | -0.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.63 | 7.44 | -1.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MNDFX | RIDAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.15 | 1.46 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 0.75 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 | 0.69 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.67 | -0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between MNDFX and RIDAX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MNDFX vs. RIDAX - Dividend Comparison
MNDFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.36%, more than RIDAX's 9.14% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNDFX Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series | 9.36% | 9.64% | 10.46% | 7.81% | 9.77% | 7.31% | 1.93% | 5.18% | 15.02% | 24.95% | 4.89% | 15.83% |
RIDAX The Income Fund of America Class R-1 | 9.14% | 9.24% | 5.14% | 2.38% | 6.20% | 5.92% | 2.09% | 4.25% | 6.58% | 3.68% | 2.32% | 4.26% |
Drawdowns
MNDFX vs. RIDAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNDFX drawdown since its inception was -62.03%, which is greater than RIDAX's maximum drawdown of -42.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNDFX and RIDAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MNDFX | RIDAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.03% | -42.37% | -19.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.54% | -8.25% | -4.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.87% | -16.28% | -1.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.03% | -26.22% | -35.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.55% | -5.77% | +0.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.11% | -4.42% | -7.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.14% | 1.76% | +1.38% |
Volatility
MNDFX vs. RIDAX - Volatility Comparison
Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series (MNDFX) has a higher volatility of 3.14% compared to The Income Fund of America Class R-1 (RIDAX) at 2.91%. This indicates that MNDFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RIDAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MNDFX | RIDAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.14% | 2.91% | +0.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.66% | 5.47% | +3.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.53% | 9.48% | +7.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.51% | 9.46% | +5.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.67% | 10.67% | +11.00% |