MNDFX vs. GQHPX
Compare and contrast key facts about Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series (MNDFX) and GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQHPX).
MNDFX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Nov 7, 2008. GQHPX is managed by GQG Partners Inc. It was launched on Jun 29, 2021.
Performance
MNDFX vs. GQHPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MNDFX vs. GQHPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNDFX Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series | 5.01% | 15.76% | 11.60% | 5.64% | -4.22% | 7.22% |
GQHPX GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund | 11.95% | 7.53% | 12.69% | 3.94% | 6.73% | 10.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MNDFX achieves a 5.01% return, which is significantly lower than GQHPX's 11.95% return.
MNDFX
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- -4.75%
- YTD
- 5.01%
- 6M
- 9.90%
- 1Y
- 17.82%
- 3Y*
- 12.93%
- 5Y*
- 8.77%
- 10Y*
- 4.78%
GQHPX
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -2.01%
- YTD
- 11.95%
- 6M
- 11.35%
- 1Y
- 11.06%
- 3Y*
- 12.76%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MNDFX vs. GQHPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MNDFX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than GQHPX's 0.57% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MNDFX vs. GQHPX — Risk / Return Rank
MNDFX
GQHPX
MNDFX vs. GQHPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series (MNDFX) and GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQHPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MNDFX | GQHPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.15 | 1.05 | +0.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.65 | 1.43 | +0.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.20 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.41 | 1.50 | -0.09 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.63 | 4.94 | +0.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MNDFX | GQHPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.15 | 1.05 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.90 | -0.50 |
Correlation
The correlation between MNDFX and GQHPX is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MNDFX vs. GQHPX - Dividend Comparison
MNDFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.36%, more than GQHPX's 2.66% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNDFX Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series | 9.36% | 9.64% | 10.46% | 7.81% | 9.77% | 7.31% | 1.93% | 5.18% | 15.02% | 24.95% | 4.89% | 15.83% |
GQHPX GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund | 2.66% | 2.98% | 3.14% | 2.64% | 3.24% | 0.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
MNDFX vs. GQHPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNDFX drawdown since its inception was -62.03%, which is greater than GQHPX's maximum drawdown of -17.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNDFX and GQHPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MNDFX | GQHPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.03% | -17.26% | -44.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.54% | -8.57% | -3.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.87% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.55% | -2.01% | -3.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.11% | -3.36% | -8.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.14% | 2.64% | +0.50% |
Volatility
MNDFX vs. GQHPX - Volatility Comparison
Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series (MNDFX) has a higher volatility of 3.14% compared to GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQHPX) at 2.66%. This indicates that MNDFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GQHPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MNDFX | GQHPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.14% | 2.66% | +0.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.66% | 7.00% | +1.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.53% | 11.93% | +4.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.51% | 12.67% | +1.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.67% | 12.67% | +9.00% |