GQHPX vs. FWWFX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

GQHPX (GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund) and FWWFX (Fidelity Worldwide Fund) are both mutual funds - GQHPX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by GQG Partners Inc, while FWWFX is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. Over the past 3 years, GQHPX returned 11.11%/yr vs 26.09%/yr for FWWFX. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GQHPX charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for FWWFX.

Performance

GQHPX vs. FWWFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQHPX) and Fidelity Worldwide Fund (FWWFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GQHPX achieves a 7.21% return, which is significantly lower than FWWFX's 24.21% return.

GQHPX

• 1D: 0.36%
• 1M: -5.13%
• YTD: 7.21%
• 6M: 7.36%
• 1Y: 9.00%
• 3Y*: 11.11%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FWWFX

• 1D: 0.36%
• 1M: 6.09%
• YTD: 24.21%
• 6M: 23.16%
• 1Y: 42.69%
• 3Y*: 26.09%
• 5Y*: 12.87%
• 10Y*: 15.99%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GQHPX vs. FWWFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
GQHPX GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund	7.21%	7.53%	12.69%	3.94%	6.73%	10.34%
FWWFX Fidelity Worldwide Fund	24.21%	16.16%	27.65%	24.96%	-25.74%	5.99%

Correlation

The correlation between GQHPX and FWWFX is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.21
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2021	0.47

The correlation between GQHPX and FWWFX shifts across timeframes, from -0.21 (1 year) to 0.47 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

GQHPX vs. FWWFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GQHPX

GQHPX Risk / Return Rank: 16
GQHPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
GQHPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
GQHPX Omega Ratio Rank: 12
GQHPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
GQHPX Martin Ratio Rank: 18

FWWFX

FWWFX Risk / Return Rank: 77
FWWFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
FWWFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
FWWFX Omega Ratio Rank: 68
FWWFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
FWWFX Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GQHPX vs. FWWFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQHPX) and Fidelity Worldwide Fund (FWWFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GQHPX	FWWFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.96	2.36	-1.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.46	3.08	-1.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.42	-0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.51	3.74	-2.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.40	15.86	-11.46

GQHPX vs. FWWFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GQHPX Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is lower than the FWWFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GQHPX and FWWFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GQHPX vs. FWWFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GQHPX drawdown since its inception was -17.26%, smaller than the maximum FWWFX drawdown of -56.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GQHPX and FWWFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GQHPX	FWWFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.26%	-56.54%	+39.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.50%	-11.74%	+5.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.71%	-22.61%	+13.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.72%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.72%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.17%	0.00%	-6.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.35%	-9.42%	+6.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.22%	2.77%	-0.55%

Volatility

GQHPX vs. FWWFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQHPX) is 3.96%, while Fidelity Worldwide Fund (FWWFX) has a volatility of 7.76%. This indicates that GQHPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FWWFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GQHPX	FWWFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.96%	7.76%	-3.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.18%	15.14%	-6.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.24%	18.69%	-8.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.68%	19.13%	-6.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.68%	18.91%	-6.23%

GQHPX vs. FWWFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GQHPX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than FWWFX's 0.77% expense ratio.

Dividends

GQHPX vs. FWWFX - Dividend Comparison

GQHPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.71%, less than FWWFX's 9.29% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FWWFX Fidelity Worldwide Fund	9.29%	11.54%	14.64%	0.94%	6.29%	12.76%	8.08%	4.87%	9.63%	6.24%	1.22%	3.38%
GQHPX GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund	3.71%	2.98%	3.14%	2.64%	3.24%	0.77%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GQHPX and FWWFX in my portfolio?

GQHPX and FWWFX have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GQHPX or FWWFX?

FWWFX has higher volatility (7.76%) compared to GQHPX (3.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GQHPX dropped -17.26% vs FWWFX's -56.54%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FWWFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.