PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MNDFX vs. FLCSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MNDFX vs. FLCSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series (MNDFX) and Fidelity Large Cap Stock Fund (FLCSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MNDFX achieves a 16.94% return, which is significantly higher than FLCSX's 11.77% return. Over the past 10 years, MNDFX has underperformed FLCSX with an annualized return of 5.22%, while FLCSX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.29% annualized return.


MNDFX

1D
-0.10%
1M
1.53%
6M
9.90%
YTD
16.94%
1Y
30.93%
3Y*
15.12%
5Y*
10.06%
10Y*
5.22%
ALL TIME*
8.31%

FLCSX

1D
0.95%
1M
0.95%
6M
7.88%
YTD
11.77%
1Y
24.54%
3Y*
23.36%
5Y*
16.49%
10Y*
15.29%
ALL TIME*
10.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MNDFX vs. FLCSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MNDFX
Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series
16.94%15.76%11.60%5.64%-4.22%22.45%2.44%-28.95%-4.30%23.39%
FLCSX
Fidelity Large Cap Stock Fund
11.77%27.49%26.31%23.51%-8.02%25.80%9.05%31.59%-13.62%17.86%

Correlation

The correlation between MNDFX and FLCSX is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2008

0.87

Over the past year, the correlation between MNDFX and FLCSX has dropped to 0.48 - well below their long-term average of 0.87, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MNDFX vs. FLCSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MNDFX
MNDFX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
MNDFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MNDFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
MNDFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
MNDFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
MNDFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

FLCSX
FLCSX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FLCSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MNDFX vs. FLCSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series (MNDFX) and Fidelity Large Cap Stock Fund (FLCSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MNDFXFLCSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.31

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.38

2.39

+1.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.25

10.65

+5.61

MNDFX vs. FLCSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MNDFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is higher than the FLCSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MNDFX and FLCSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MNDFX vs. FLCSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNDFX drawdown since its inception was -62.03%, roughly equal to the maximum FLCSX drawdown of -63.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNDFX and FLCSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MNDFXFLCSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.03%

-63.67%

+1.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.70%

-9.55%

+2.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.04%

-18.82%

+2.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.87%

-21.69%

+3.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.03%

-37.11%

-24.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.58%

-0.09%

-1.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.90%

-13.75%

+1.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.80%

2.14%

-0.34%

Volatility

MNDFX vs. FLCSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series (MNDFX) is 3.30%, while Fidelity Large Cap Stock Fund (FLCSX) has a volatility of 3.52%. This indicates that MNDFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLCSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MNDFXFLCSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.30%

3.52%

-0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.98%

10.11%

-2.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.40%

12.99%

-1.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.50%

16.82%

-2.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.64%

18.57%

+3.07%

MNDFX vs. FLCSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MNDFX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than FLCSX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

MNDFX vs. FLCSX - Dividend Comparison

MNDFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.46%, less than FLCSX's 8.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLCSX
Fidelity Large Cap Stock Fund
8.84%6.50%4.26%2.83%3.07%4.71%3.93%5.43%7.63%3.25%3.61%4.55%
MNDFX
Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series
8.46%9.64%10.46%7.81%9.77%7.31%1.93%5.18%15.02%24.95%4.89%15.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


MNDFX and FLCSX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLCSX has higher volatility (3.52%) compared to MNDFX (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MNDFX dropped -62.03% vs FLCSX's -63.67%.

MNDFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MNDFX and FLCSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer