FLCSX vs. FMCSX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

FLCSX (Fidelity Large Cap Stock Fund) and FMCSX (Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund) are both mutual funds - FLCSX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while FMCSX is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, FLCSX returned 15.14%/yr vs 12.33%/yr for FMCSX. Their correlation of 0.90 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FLCSX charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.62%/yr for FMCSX.

Performance

FLCSX vs. FMCSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Large Cap Stock Fund (FLCSX) and Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund (FMCSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLCSX achieves a 10.72% return, which is significantly lower than FMCSX's 14.84% return. Over the past 10 years, FLCSX has outperformed FMCSX with an annualized return of 15.14%, while FMCSX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.33% annualized return.

FLCSX

• 1D: 1.84%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: 7.29%
• YTD: 10.72%
• 1Y: 23.37%
• 3Y*: 22.81%
• 5Y*: 16.27%
• 10Y*: 15.14%
• ALL TIME*: 10.23%

FMCSX

• 1D: 1.17%
• 1M: -3.33%
• 6M: 11.06%
• YTD: 14.84%
• 1Y: 23.84%
• 3Y*: 14.66%
• 5Y*: 10.38%
• 10Y*: 12.33%
• ALL TIME*: 11.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FLCSX Fidelity Large Cap Stock Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
FMCSX Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FLCSX vs. FMCSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLCSX Fidelity Large Cap Stock Fund	10.72%	27.49%	26.31%	23.51%	-8.02%	25.80%	9.05%	31.59%	-13.62%	17.86%
FMCSX Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund	14.84%	11.80%	14.55%	11.02%	-6.40%	28.64%	11.43%	25.39%	-6.67%	18.03%

Correlation

The correlation between FLCSX and FMCSX is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.83
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.88
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 1995	0.90

The correlation between FLCSX and FMCSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FLCSX vs. FMCSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FLCSX

FLCSX Risk / Return Rank: 73
FLCSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
FLCSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
FLCSX Omega Ratio Rank: 68
FLCSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
FLCSX Martin Ratio Rank: 82

FMCSX

FMCSX Risk / Return Rank: 60
FMCSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
FMCSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
FMCSX Omega Ratio Rank: 46
FMCSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
FMCSX Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FLCSX vs. FMCSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Large Cap Stock Fund (FLCSX) and Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund (FMCSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FLCSX	FMCSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.64	1.30	+0.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.32	1.90	+0.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.23	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.22	2.51	-0.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.89	8.76	+1.14

FLCSX vs. FMCSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLCSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the FMCSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLCSX and FMCSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FLCSX vs. FMCSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLCSX drawdown since its inception was -63.67%, roughly equal to the maximum FMCSX drawdown of -62.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLCSX and FMCSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FLCSX	FMCSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.67%	-62.19%	-1.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.55%	-8.55%	-1.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.82%	-22.33%	+3.51%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.69%	-22.33%	+0.64%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.11%	-40.55%	+3.44%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.03%	-5.29%	+4.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.75%	-9.32%	-4.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.14%	2.46%	-0.32%

Volatility

FLCSX vs. FMCSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Large Cap Stock Fund (FLCSX) is 3.40%, while Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund (FMCSX) has a volatility of 4.28%. This indicates that FLCSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FMCSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FLCSX	FMCSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.40%	4.28%	-0.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.07%	13.15%	-3.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.96%	16.59%	-3.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.82%	17.74%	-0.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.57%	18.56%	+0.01%

FLCSX vs. FMCSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLCSX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FMCSX's 0.62% expense ratio.

Dividends

FLCSX vs. FMCSX - Dividend Comparison

FLCSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.92%, more than FMCSX's 5.40% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLCSX Fidelity Large Cap Stock Fund	8.92%	6.50%	4.26%	2.83%	3.07%	4.71%	3.93%	5.43%	7.63%	3.25%	3.61%	4.55%
FMCSX Fidelity Mid-Cap Stock Fund	5.40%	1.83%	8.94%	2.60%	5.44%	12.80%	6.72%	6.63%	18.48%	6.66%	8.25%	14.18%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FLCSX and FMCSX in my portfolio?

FLCSX and FMCSX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FLCSX or FMCSX?

FMCSX has higher volatility (4.28%) compared to FLCSX (3.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLCSX dropped -63.67% vs FMCSX's -62.19%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLCSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.