MNDFX vs. FBLEX
Compare and contrast key facts about Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series (MNDFX) and Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund (FBLEX).
MNDFX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Nov 7, 2008. FBLEX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 6, 2012.
Performance
MNDFX vs. FBLEX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MNDFX vs. FBLEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNDFX Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series | 5.01% | 15.76% | 11.60% | 5.64% | -4.22% | 22.45% | 2.44% | -28.95% | -4.30% | 23.39% |
FBLEX Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund | -2.01% | 17.06% | 18.04% | 15.60% | -4.82% | 26.83% | 4.34% | 25.57% | -9.04% | 12.38% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MNDFX achieves a 5.01% return, which is significantly higher than FBLEX's -2.01% return. Over the past 10 years, MNDFX has underperformed FBLEX with an annualized return of 4.78%, while FBLEX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.11% annualized return.
MNDFX
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- -4.75%
- YTD
- 5.01%
- 6M
- 9.90%
- 1Y
- 17.82%
- 3Y*
- 12.93%
- 5Y*
- 8.77%
- 10Y*
- 4.78%
FBLEX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -6.70%
- YTD
- -2.01%
- 6M
- 2.97%
- 1Y
- 12.73%
- 3Y*
- 15.51%
- 5Y*
- 11.00%
- 10Y*
- 11.11%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MNDFX vs. FBLEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MNDFX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than FBLEX's 0.01% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MNDFX vs. FBLEX — Risk / Return Rank
MNDFX
FBLEX
MNDFX vs. FBLEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series (MNDFX) and Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund (FBLEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MNDFX | FBLEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.15 | 0.91 | +0.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.65 | 1.32 | +0.33 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.20 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.41 | 1.06 | +0.35 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.63 | 4.92 | +0.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MNDFX | FBLEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.15 | 0.91 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 0.75 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 | 0.64 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.69 | -0.29 |
Correlation
The correlation between MNDFX and FBLEX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MNDFX vs. FBLEX - Dividend Comparison
MNDFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.36%, less than FBLEX's 11.33% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNDFX Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series | 9.36% | 9.64% | 10.46% | 7.81% | 9.77% | 7.31% | 1.93% | 5.18% | 15.02% | 24.95% | 4.89% | 15.83% |
FBLEX Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund | 11.33% | 9.95% | 12.63% | 5.05% | 12.66% | 14.51% | 3.85% | 5.65% | 10.97% | 7.09% | 2.47% | 13.81% |
Drawdowns
MNDFX vs. FBLEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNDFX drawdown since its inception was -62.03%, which is greater than FBLEX's maximum drawdown of -39.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNDFX and FBLEX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MNDFX | FBLEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.03% | -39.73% | -22.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.54% | -11.55% | -0.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.87% | -19.00% | +1.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.03% | -39.73% | -22.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.55% | -6.89% | +1.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.11% | -3.86% | -8.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.14% | 2.49% | +0.65% |
Volatility
MNDFX vs. FBLEX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series (MNDFX) is 3.14%, while Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund (FBLEX) has a volatility of 3.48%. This indicates that MNDFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBLEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MNDFX | FBLEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.14% | 3.48% | -0.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.66% | 7.78% | +0.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.53% | 15.13% | +1.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.51% | 14.78% | -0.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.67% | 17.39% | +4.28% |