PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MNDFX vs. FBLEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MNDFX vs. FBLEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series (MNDFX) and Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund (FBLEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MNDFX achieves a 12.15% return, which is significantly higher than FBLEX's 8.36% return. Over the past 10 years, MNDFX has underperformed FBLEX with an annualized return of 5.24%, while FBLEX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.89% annualized return.


MNDFX

1D
0.63%
1M
2.57%
YTD
12.15%
6M
13.04%
1Y
28.75%
3Y*
16.19%
5Y*
8.97%
10Y*
5.24%

FBLEX

1D
0.33%
1M
2.07%
YTD
8.36%
6M
9.82%
1Y
22.33%
3Y*
19.15%
5Y*
11.55%
10Y*
11.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MNDFX vs. FBLEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MNDFX
Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series
12.15%15.76%11.60%5.64%-4.22%22.45%2.44%-28.95%-4.30%23.39%
FBLEX
Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund
8.36%17.06%18.04%15.60%-4.82%26.83%4.34%25.57%-9.04%12.38%

Correlation

The correlation between MNDFX and FBLEX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2012

0.93

The correlation between MNDFX and FBLEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MNDFX vs. FBLEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MNDFX
MNDFX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
MNDFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MNDFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
MNDFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
MNDFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
MNDFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

FBLEX
FBLEX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FBLEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBLEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBLEX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
FBLEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBLEX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MNDFX vs. FBLEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series (MNDFX) and Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund (FBLEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MNDFXFBLEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.40

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.48

3.35

+1.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.05

13.56

+2.50

MNDFX vs. FBLEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MNDFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.65, which is comparable to the FBLEX Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MNDFX and FBLEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MNDFXFBLEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.65

2.20

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

0.78

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

0.69

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.73

-0.31

Drawdowns

MNDFX vs. FBLEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MNDFX drawdown since its inception was -62.03%, which is greater than FBLEX's maximum drawdown of -39.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNDFX and FBLEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MNDFXFBLEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.03%

-39.73%

-22.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.70%

-6.89%

+0.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.04%

-14.71%

-1.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.87%

-19.00%

+1.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.03%

-39.73%

-22.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.20%

+0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.01%

-3.83%

-8.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.87%

1.70%

+0.17%

Volatility

MNDFX vs. FBLEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series (MNDFX) is 2.55%, while Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund (FBLEX) has a volatility of 2.69%. This indicates that MNDFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBLEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MNDFXFBLEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.55%

2.69%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.17%

7.89%

+0.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.33%

10.50%

+0.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.49%

14.79%

-0.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.67%

17.40%

+4.27%

MNDFX vs. FBLEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MNDFX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is higher than FBLEX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

MNDFX vs. FBLEX - Dividend Comparison

MNDFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.77%, less than FBLEX's 10.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBLEX
Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund
10.25%9.95%12.63%5.05%12.66%14.51%3.85%5.65%10.97%7.09%2.47%13.81%
MNDFX
Manning & Napier Disciplined Value Series
8.77%9.64%10.46%7.81%9.77%7.31%1.93%5.18%15.02%24.95%4.89%15.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


MNDFX and FBLEX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FBLEX has higher volatility (2.69%) compared to MNDFX (2.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MNDFX dropped -62.03% vs FBLEX's -39.73%.

MNDFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MNDFX and FBLEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer