FBLEX vs. QQQM

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

FBLEX (Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund) and QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) are both funds - FBLEX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while QQQM is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Over the past 5 years, FBLEX returned 12.95%/yr vs 17.04%/yr for QQQM. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FBLEX charges 0.01%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QQQM.

Performance

FBLEX vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund (FBLEX) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBLEX achieves a 10.35% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's 20.46% return.

FBLEX

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: 2.10%
• YTD: 10.35%
• 6M: 9.82%
• 1Y: 25.03%
• 3Y*: 18.84%
• 5Y*: 12.95%
• 10Y*: 12.15%

QQQM

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 2.98%
• YTD: 20.46%
• 6M: 19.51%
• 1Y: 41.06%
• 3Y*: 27.57%
• 5Y*: 17.04%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBLEX vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FBLEX Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund	10.35%	17.06%	18.04%	15.60%	-4.82%	26.83%	12.52%
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	20.46%	20.85%	25.68%	55.01%	-32.52%	27.45%	6.64%

Correlation

The correlation between FBLEX and QQQM is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.57
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.55
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2020	0.60

The correlation between FBLEX and QQQM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FBLEX vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBLEX

FBLEX Risk / Return Rank: 78
FBLEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
FBLEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
FBLEX Omega Ratio Rank: 68
FBLEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
FBLEX Martin Ratio Rank: 85

QQQM

QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 72
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 73
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBLEX vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund (FBLEX) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FBLEX	QQQM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.34	2.36	-0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.34	3.05	+0.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.41	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.68	3.45	+0.23
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.83	12.82	+2.01

FBLEX vs. QQQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBLEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is comparable to the QQQM Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBLEX and QQQM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FBLEX vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBLEX drawdown since its inception was -39.73%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBLEX and QQQM.

Drawdown Indicators

	FBLEX	QQQM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.73%	-35.04%	-4.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.89%	-11.96%	+5.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.71%	-22.70%	+7.99%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.00%	-35.04%	+16.04%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.73%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.64%	-0.97%	+0.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.81%	-8.20%	+4.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.70%	3.21%	-1.51%

Volatility

FBLEX vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund (FBLEX) is 3.41%, while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) has a volatility of 8.28%. This indicates that FBLEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FBLEX	QQQM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.41%	8.28%	-4.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.21%	14.05%	-5.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.81%	17.55%	-6.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.81%	22.48%	-7.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.41%	22.26%	-4.85%

FBLEX vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBLEX has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FBLEX vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

FBLEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.06%, more than QQQM's 0.53% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FBLEX Fidelity Series Stock Selector Large Cap Value Fund	10.06%	9.95%	12.63%	5.05%	12.66%	14.51%	3.85%	5.65%	10.97%	7.09%	2.47%	13.81%
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	0.53%	0.50%	0.61%	0.65%	0.83%	0.40%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FBLEX and QQQM in my portfolio?

FBLEX and QQQM have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FBLEX or QQQM?

QQQM has higher volatility (8.28%) compared to FBLEX (3.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBLEX dropped -39.73% vs QQQM's -35.04%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.