EXOSX vs. MNBAX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

EXOSX (Manning & Napier Overseas Series) and MNBAX (Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series) are both mutual funds - EXOSX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Manning & Napier, while MNBAX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Manning & Napier. Over the past 10 years, EXOSX returned 7.66%/yr vs 6.85%/yr for MNBAX. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EXOSX charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for MNBAX.

Performance

EXOSX vs. MNBAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Manning & Napier Overseas Series (EXOSX) and Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series (MNBAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EXOSX achieves a 3.12% return, which is significantly higher than MNBAX's 1.78% return. Over the past 10 years, EXOSX has outperformed MNBAX with an annualized return of 7.66%, while MNBAX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.85% annualized return.

EXOSX

• 1D: 1.01%
• 1M: 2.04%
• YTD: 3.12%
• 6M: 3.51%
• 1Y: 8.66%
• 3Y*: 8.50%
• 5Y*: 2.19%
• 10Y*: 7.66%

MNBAX

• 1D: 0.62%
• 1M: 1.04%
• YTD: 1.78%
• 6M: 1.67%
• 1Y: 9.12%
• 3Y*: 7.86%
• 5Y*: 3.27%
• 10Y*: 6.85%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EXOSX vs. MNBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EXOSX Manning & Napier Overseas Series	3.12%	16.21%	3.33%	19.89%	-24.26%	11.50%	27.07%	27.52%	-17.23%	23.92%
MNBAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series	1.78%	10.01%	7.16%	13.16%	-16.70%	11.27%	17.65%	19.30%	-4.31%	14.90%

Correlation

The correlation between EXOSX and MNBAX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2002	0.81

The correlation between EXOSX and MNBAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EXOSX vs. MNBAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EXOSX

EXOSX Risk / Return Rank: 7
EXOSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
EXOSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
EXOSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7
EXOSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
EXOSX Martin Ratio Rank: 9

MNBAX

MNBAX Risk / Return Rank: 13
MNBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
MNBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
MNBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 13
MNBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
MNBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 14

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EXOSX vs. MNBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier Overseas Series (EXOSX) and Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series (MNBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EXOSX	MNBAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.56	1.00	-0.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.88	1.47	-0.59
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.17	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.68	0.96	-0.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.35	3.70	-1.35

EXOSX vs. MNBAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EXOSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.56, which is lower than the MNBAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EXOSX and MNBAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EXOSX vs. MNBAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EXOSX drawdown since its inception was -55.50%, which is greater than MNBAX's maximum drawdown of -39.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXOSX and MNBAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	EXOSX	MNBAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.50%	-39.62%	-15.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.77%	-9.23%	-2.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.91%	-10.28%	-4.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.71%	-21.95%	-15.76%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.71%	-21.95%	-15.76%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.68%	-1.17%	-0.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.05%	-6.65%	-4.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.41%	2.40%	+1.01%

Volatility

EXOSX vs. MNBAX - Volatility Comparison

Manning & Napier Overseas Series (EXOSX) has a higher volatility of 4.72% compared to Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series (MNBAX) at 3.33%. This indicates that EXOSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MNBAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EXOSX	MNBAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.72%	3.33%	+1.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.93%	7.36%	+4.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.46%	8.88%	+5.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.76%	9.54%	+7.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.70%	9.76%	+6.94%

EXOSX vs. MNBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EXOSX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than MNBAX's 1.02% expense ratio.

Dividends

EXOSX vs. MNBAX - Dividend Comparison

EXOSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, less than MNBAX's 9.97% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EXOSX Manning & Napier Overseas Series	1.10%	1.13%	1.29%	1.27%	0.82%	1.85%	0.86%	1.72%	0.91%	1.79%	1.71%	1.84%
MNBAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series	9.97%	10.14%	4.23%	1.81%	3.68%	5.12%	6.49%	4.49%	5.73%	6.53%	1.15%	2.05%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EXOSX and MNBAX in my portfolio?

EXOSX and MNBAX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EXOSX or MNBAX?

EXOSX has higher volatility (4.72%) compared to MNBAX (3.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EXOSX dropped -55.50% vs MNBAX's -39.62%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MNBAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.00 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.