EXOSX vs. MNBAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Manning & Napier Overseas Series (EXOSX) and Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series (MNBAX).
EXOSX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Jul 9, 2002. MNBAX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Oct 11, 1993.
Performance
EXOSX vs. MNBAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
EXOSX vs. MNBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXOSX Manning & Napier Overseas Series | -7.05% | 16.21% | 3.33% | 19.89% | -24.26% | 11.50% | 27.07% | 27.52% | -17.23% | 23.92% |
MNBAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series | -6.16% | 10.01% | 7.16% | 13.16% | -16.70% | 11.27% | 17.65% | 19.30% | -4.31% | 14.90% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EXOSX achieves a -7.05% return, which is significantly lower than MNBAX's -6.16% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with EXOSX having a 6.47% annualized return and MNBAX not far behind at 6.19%.
EXOSX
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- -9.74%
- YTD
- -7.05%
- 6M
- -6.01%
- 1Y
- 3.66%
- 3Y*
- 6.53%
- 5Y*
- 1.56%
- 10Y*
- 6.47%
MNBAX
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- -6.99%
- YTD
- -6.16%
- 6M
- -3.55%
- 1Y
- 3.07%
- 3Y*
- 5.83%
- 5Y*
- 2.51%
- 10Y*
- 6.19%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EXOSX vs. MNBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
EXOSX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than MNBAX's 1.02% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
EXOSX vs. MNBAX — Risk / Return Rank
EXOSX
MNBAX
EXOSX vs. MNBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier Overseas Series (EXOSX) and Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series (MNBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EXOSX | MNBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.17 | 0.30 | -0.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.35 | 0.50 | -0.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.06 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.15 | 0.25 | -0.10 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.56 | 1.05 | -0.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EXOSX | MNBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 | 0.30 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 | 0.27 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | 0.64 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.45 | -0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between EXOSX and MNBAX is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
EXOSX vs. MNBAX - Dividend Comparison
EXOSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, less than MNBAX's 10.81% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EXOSX Manning & Napier Overseas Series | 1.22% | 1.13% | 1.29% | 1.27% | 0.82% | 1.85% | 0.86% | 1.72% | 0.91% | 1.79% | 1.71% | 1.84% |
MNBAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series | 10.81% | 10.14% | 4.23% | 1.81% | 3.68% | 5.12% | 6.49% | 4.49% | 5.73% | 6.53% | 1.15% | 2.05% |
Drawdowns
EXOSX vs. MNBAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EXOSX drawdown since its inception was -55.50%, which is greater than MNBAX's maximum drawdown of -39.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EXOSX and MNBAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| EXOSX | MNBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.50% | -39.62% | -15.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.77% | -9.23% | -2.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.71% | -21.95% | -15.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.71% | -21.95% | -15.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.38% | -8.87% | -2.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.12% | -6.68% | -4.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.05% | 2.17% | +0.88% |
Volatility
EXOSX vs. MNBAX - Volatility Comparison
Manning & Napier Overseas Series (EXOSX) has a higher volatility of 5.78% compared to Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series (MNBAX) at 3.40%. This indicates that EXOSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MNBAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| EXOSX | MNBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.78% | 3.40% | +2.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.88% | 6.27% | +3.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.27% | 10.29% | +5.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.51% | 9.38% | +7.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.59% | 9.66% | +6.93% |