MNBAX vs. MNHAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series (MNBAX) and Manning & Napier High Yield Bond I (MNHAX).
MNBAX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Oct 11, 1993. MNHAX is managed by Manning & Napier. It was launched on Aug 1, 2012.
Performance
MNBAX vs. MNHAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MNBAX vs. MNHAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNBAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series | -6.16% | 10.01% | 7.16% | 13.16% | -16.70% | 11.27% | 17.65% | 19.30% | -4.31% | 14.90% |
MNHAX Manning & Napier High Yield Bond I | -1.67% | 6.90% | 9.29% | 13.49% | -7.38% | 10.27% | 6.58% | 14.25% | -0.98% | 8.68% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MNBAX achieves a -6.16% return, which is significantly lower than MNHAX's -1.67% return. Over the past 10 years, MNBAX has underperformed MNHAX with an annualized return of 6.19%, while MNHAX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.73% annualized return.
MNBAX
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- -6.99%
- YTD
- -6.16%
- 6M
- -3.55%
- 1Y
- 3.07%
- 3Y*
- 5.83%
- 5Y*
- 2.51%
- 10Y*
- 6.19%
MNHAX
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- -2.47%
- YTD
- -1.67%
- 6M
- -0.40%
- 1Y
- 4.27%
- 3Y*
- 8.42%
- 5Y*
- 5.33%
- 10Y*
- 6.73%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MNBAX vs. MNHAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MNBAX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than MNHAX's 0.66% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MNBAX vs. MNHAX — Risk / Return Rank
MNBAX
MNHAX
MNBAX vs. MNHAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series (MNBAX) and Manning & Napier High Yield Bond I (MNHAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MNBAX | MNHAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.30 | 1.09 | -0.79 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.50 | 1.40 | -0.91 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.24 | -0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.25 | 1.10 | -0.85 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.05 | 4.36 | -3.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MNBAX | MNHAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 | 1.09 | -0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | 0.37 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 0.63 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.65 | -0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between MNBAX and MNHAX is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
MNBAX vs. MNHAX - Dividend Comparison
MNBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.81%, more than MNHAX's 6.64% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNBAX Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series | 10.81% | 10.14% | 4.23% | 1.81% | 3.68% | 5.12% | 6.49% | 4.49% | 5.73% | 6.53% | 1.15% | 2.05% |
MNHAX Manning & Napier High Yield Bond I | 6.64% | 7.29% | 7.02% | 8.59% | 7.61% | 9.81% | 6.26% | 8.24% | 6.38% | 6.20% | 7.68% | 6.64% |
Drawdowns
MNBAX vs. MNHAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNBAX drawdown since its inception was -39.62%, which is greater than MNHAX's maximum drawdown of -20.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNBAX and MNHAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MNBAX | MNHAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.62% | -20.13% | -19.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.23% | -3.40% | -5.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.95% | -20.13% | -1.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.95% | -20.13% | -1.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.87% | -14.06% | +5.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.68% | -3.41% | -3.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.17% | 0.86% | +1.31% |
Volatility
MNBAX vs. MNHAX - Volatility Comparison
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extended Term Series (MNBAX) has a higher volatility of 3.40% compared to Manning & Napier High Yield Bond I (MNHAX) at 1.68%. This indicates that MNBAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MNHAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MNBAX | MNHAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.40% | 1.68% | +1.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.27% | 2.20% | +4.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.29% | 3.74% | +6.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.38% | 14.41% | -5.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.66% | 10.69% | -1.03% |