MNA vs. CGDV
Compare and contrast key facts about IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF (MNA) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV).
MNA and CGDV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MNA is a passively managed fund by New York Life that tracks the performance of the IQ Merger Arbitrage Index. It was launched on Nov 17, 2009. CGDV is an actively managed fund by Capital Group. It was launched on Feb 22, 2022.
Performance
MNA vs. CGDV - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MNA vs. CGDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNA IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF | 0.89% | 8.59% | 4.93% | 0.18% | -0.03% |
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF | -1.69% | 25.50% | 20.10% | 28.81% | -2.89% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MNA achieves a 0.89% return, which is significantly higher than CGDV's -1.69% return.
MNA
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- -0.52%
- YTD
- 0.89%
- 6M
- 0.67%
- 1Y
- 5.14%
- 3Y*
- 4.93%
- 5Y*
- 2.06%
- 10Y*
- 2.66%
CGDV
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- -5.91%
- YTD
- -1.69%
- 6M
- 1.90%
- 1Y
- 21.40%
- 3Y*
- 21.61%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MNA vs. CGDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
MNA has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than CGDV's 0.33% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MNA vs. CGDV — Risk / Return Rank
MNA
CGDV
MNA vs. CGDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF (MNA) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MNA | CGDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.02 | 1.28 | -0.26 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.56 | 1.86 | -0.30 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.29 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.39 | 1.99 | +0.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.41 | 8.44 | +0.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MNA | CGDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.02 | 1.28 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 1.05 | -0.69 |
Correlation
The correlation between MNA and CGDV is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
MNA vs. CGDV - Dividend Comparison
MNA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CGDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MNA IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.21% | 0.87% |
CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF | 1.33% | 1.29% | 1.60% | 1.65% | 1.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
MNA vs. CGDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MNA drawdown since its inception was -16.68%, smaller than the maximum CGDV drawdown of -21.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MNA and CGDV.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MNA | CGDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.68% | -21.82% | +5.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.21% | -10.91% | +8.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.74% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.68% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.12% | -6.61% | +5.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.86% | -3.72% | +0.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.56% | 2.57% | -2.01% |
Volatility
MNA vs. CGDV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF (MNA) is 1.81%, while Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) has a volatility of 5.55%. This indicates that MNA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MNA | CGDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.81% | 5.55% | -3.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.06% | 9.27% | -6.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.04% | 16.76% | -11.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.98% | 15.61% | -10.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.55% | 15.61% | -9.06% |