MMTM vs. SMOM
MMTM (SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF) and SMOM (Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MMTM is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 1500 Positive Momentum Tilt Index, while SMOM is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Symmetry Partners. MMTM is passively managed, while SMOM is actively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MMTM charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for SMOM.
Performance
MMTM vs. SMOM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MMTM achieves a 4.87% return, which is significantly lower than SMOM's 8.22% return.
MMTM
- 1D
- -1.55%
- 1M
- -4.07%
- 6M
- 3.09%
- YTD
- 4.87%
- 1Y
- 14.75%
- 3Y*
- 18.46%
- 5Y*
- 12.36%
- 10Y*
- 14.13%
SMOM
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -0.30%
- 6M
- 7.11%
- YTD
- 8.22%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MMTM vs. SMOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MMTM SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF | 4.87% | 5.41% |
SMOM Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF | 8.22% | 2.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between MMTM and SMOM is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2025 | 0.79 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MMTM vs. SMOM — Risk / Return Rank
MMTM
SMOM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MMTM vs. SMOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM) and Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF (SMOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MMTM | SMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.50 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.84 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MMTM vs. SMOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MMTM drawdown since its inception was -33.85%, which is greater than SMOM's maximum drawdown of -7.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMTM and SMOM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MMTM | SMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.85% | -7.45% | -26.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.89% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.08% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.72% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.35% | -1.46% | -3.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.19% | -1.52% | -2.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.53% | — | — |
Volatility
MMTM vs. SMOM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MMTM | SMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.47% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.61% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.03% | 12.49% | +2.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.33% | 12.49% | +5.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.67% | 12.49% | +6.18% |
MMTM vs. SMOM - Expense Ratio Comparison
MMTM has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than SMOM's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
MMTM vs. SMOM - Dividend Comparison
MMTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, more than SMOM's 0.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMTM SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF | 0.89% | 0.86% | 0.83% | 1.16% | 1.67% | 0.95% | 1.14% | 1.55% | 1.64% | 1.52% | 1.98% | 1.68% |
SMOM Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF | 0.15% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MMTM and SMOM have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MMTM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MMTM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for SMOM.
MMTM has the higher dividend yield at 0.89%, compared with 0.15% for SMOM.
MMTM is categorized as Momentum, while SMOM is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Symmetry Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for MMTM and 0.63% for SMOM.
Find the right allocation for MMTM and SMOM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer