MMTM vs. PTH
MMTM (SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF) and PTH (Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds - MMTM tracks the S&P 1500 Positive Momentum Tilt Index while PTH tracks the Dorsey Wright Healthcare Technical Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MMTM returned 14.19%/yr vs 14.68%/yr for PTH. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MMTM charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PTH.
Performance
MMTM vs. PTH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MMTM achieves a 5.40% return, which is significantly lower than PTH's 18.11% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MMTM having a 14.19% annualized return and PTH not far ahead at 14.68%.
MMTM
- 1D
- -1.44%
- 1M
- -2.52%
- 6M
- 3.08%
- YTD
- 5.40%
- 1Y
- 15.73%
- 3Y*
- 18.92%
- 5Y*
- 12.12%
- 10Y*
- 14.19%
PTH
- 1D
- -2.00%
- 1M
- 13.65%
- 6M
- 20.08%
- YTD
- 18.11%
- 1Y
- 59.34%
- 3Y*
- 14.43%
- 5Y*
- 2.13%
- 10Y*
- 14.68%
MMTM vs. PTH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMTM SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF | 5.40% | 13.26% | 29.94% | 22.49% | -16.12% | 26.33% | 19.27% | 29.98% | -4.62% | 24.41% |
PTH Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF | 18.11% | 27.91% | 2.36% | -4.54% | -20.61% | -3.20% | 67.26% | 34.45% | -1.23% | 50.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between MMTM and PTH is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2012 | 0.53 |
The correlation between MMTM and PTH shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.60 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
MMTM vs. PTH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MMTM
PTH
Technology
-
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
Communication Services
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Technology
MMTM
PTH
-
Financial Services
MMTM
PTH
Consumer Cyclical
MMTM
PTH
-
Healthcare
MMTM
PTH
Communication Services
MMTM
PTH
-
Industrials
MMTM
PTH
-
Consumer Defensive
MMTM
PTH
-
Real Estate
MMTM
PTH
-
Utilities
MMTM
PTH
-
Basic Materials
MMTM
PTH
-
Energy
MMTM
PTH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MMTM vs. PTH — Risk / Return Rank
MMTM
PTH
MMTM vs. PTH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM) and Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF (PTH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MMTM | PTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.39 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.60 | 4.98 | -3.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.34 | 12.59 | -6.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MMTM vs. PTH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MMTM drawdown since its inception was -33.85%, smaller than the maximum PTH drawdown of -53.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMTM and PTH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MMTM | PTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.85% | -53.52% | +19.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.89% | -11.98% | +2.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.08% | -27.74% | +5.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.72% | -50.07% | +26.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.85% | -53.52% | +19.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.87% | -4.82% | -0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.19% | -16.95% | +12.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.49% | 4.73% | -2.24% |
Volatility
MMTM vs. PTH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF (MMTM) is 5.31%, while Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF (PTH) has a volatility of 7.18%. This indicates that MMTM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PTH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MMTM | PTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.31% | 7.18% | -1.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.49% | 19.19% | -7.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.94% | 24.33% | -9.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.32% | 25.67% | -7.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.67% | 27.32% | -8.65% |
MMTM vs. PTH - Expense Ratio Comparison
MMTM has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than PTH's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
MMTM vs. PTH - Dividend Comparison
MMTM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than PTH's 2.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMTM SPDR S&P 1500 Momentum Tilt ETF | 0.88% | 0.86% | 0.83% | 1.16% | 1.67% | 0.95% | 1.14% | 1.55% | 1.64% | 1.52% | 1.98% | 1.68% |
PTH Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF | 2.60% | 3.07% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MMTM and PTH have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PTH has higher volatility (7.18%) compared to MMTM (5.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMTM dropped -33.85% vs PTH's -53.52%.
On 10-year performance, PTH leads with 14.68% vs 14.19% for MMTM. On fees, MMTM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, MMTM has been the lower-risk option at 5.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PTH has performed better with a 14.68% return vs 14.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MMTM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PTH.
PTH has the higher dividend yield at 2.60%, compared with 0.88% for MMTM.
MMTM tracks S&P 1500 Positive Momentum Tilt Index, while PTH tracks Dorsey Wright Healthcare Technical Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for MMTM and 0.60% for PTH.
PTH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MMTM and PTH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer