PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MMIT vs. XOMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MMIT vs. XOMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IQ MacKay Municipal Intermediate ETF (MMIT) and YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MMIT vs. XOMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
MMIT
IQ MacKay Municipal Intermediate ETF
0.17%5.03%1.46%3.81%
XOMO
YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF
23.45%6.90%6.11%-8.62%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMIT achieves a 0.17% return, which is significantly lower than XOMO's 23.45% return.


MMIT

1D
0.23%
1M
-1.73%
YTD
0.17%
6M
1.66%
1Y
4.37%
3Y*
3.18%
5Y*
1.11%
10Y*

XOMO

1D
-4.29%
1M
2.32%
YTD
23.45%
6M
31.32%
1Y
22.43%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MMIT vs. XOMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

MMIT has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is lower than XOMO's 1.01% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

MMIT vs. XOMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MMIT
MMIT Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
MMIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MMIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
MMIT Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
MMIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
MMIT Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

XOMO
XOMO Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
XOMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
XOMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOMO Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MMIT vs. XOMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ MacKay Municipal Intermediate ETF (MMIT) and YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MMITXOMODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.16

1.02

+0.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.44

1.40

+0.05

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.20

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.54

1.47

+0.07

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.40

3.35

+2.04

MMIT vs. XOMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MMIT Sharpe Ratio is 1.16, which is comparable to the XOMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMIT and XOMO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MMITXOMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.16

1.02

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.55

+0.06

Correlation

The correlation between MMIT and XOMO is -0.00. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

MMIT vs. XOMO - Dividend Comparison

MMIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.57%, less than XOMO's 30.57% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
MMIT
IQ MacKay Municipal Intermediate ETF
3.57%3.54%3.76%3.46%2.30%1.81%2.59%4.14%2.46%0.35%
XOMO
YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF
30.57%31.64%26.94%5.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

MMIT vs. XOMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMIT drawdown since its inception was -12.28%, smaller than the maximum XOMO drawdown of -18.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMIT and XOMO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MMITXOMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.28%

-18.90%

+6.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.11%

-15.24%

+12.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.97%

-5.12%

+3.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.29%

-7.05%

+4.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.89%

6.69%

-5.80%

Volatility

MMIT vs. XOMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for IQ MacKay Municipal Intermediate ETF (MMIT) is 0.96%, while YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO) has a volatility of 6.57%. This indicates that MMIT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XOMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MMITXOMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.96%

6.57%

-5.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.64%

13.81%

-12.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.81%

22.02%

-18.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.53%

18.46%

-14.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.33%

18.46%

-14.13%