MMIT vs. QAI
MMIT (IQ MacKay Municipal Intermediate ETF) and QAI (IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MMIT is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by New York Life, while QAI is a Long-Short fund tracking the IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Index. MMIT is actively managed, while QAI is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MMIT returned 1.19%/yr vs 4.75%/yr for QAI. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MMIT charges 0.31%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for QAI.
Performance
MMIT vs. QAI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MMIT achieves a 1.61% return, which is significantly lower than QAI's 9.76% return.
MMIT
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 1.21%
- YTD
- 1.61%
- 6M
- 1.67%
- 1Y
- 6.18%
- 3Y*
- 3.68%
- 5Y*
- 1.19%
- 10Y*
- —
QAI
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 1.83%
- YTD
- 9.76%
- 6M
- 9.54%
- 1Y
- 16.95%
- 3Y*
- 10.39%
- 5Y*
- 4.75%
- 10Y*
- 4.06%
MMIT vs. QAI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMIT IQ MacKay Municipal Intermediate ETF | 1.61% | 5.03% | 1.46% | 5.42% | -7.40% | 1.55% | 6.17% | 7.49% | 2.41% | 0.43% |
QAI IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF | 9.76% | 8.29% | 6.67% | 10.07% | -8.68% | -0.16% | 5.73% | 8.68% | -3.32% | 1.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between MMIT and QAI is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2017 | 0.14 |
The correlation between MMIT and QAI shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (all time) to 0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MMIT vs. QAI — Risk / Return Rank
MMIT
QAI
MMIT vs. QAI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ MacKay Municipal Intermediate ETF (MMIT) and IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF (QAI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MMIT | QAI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.53 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.40 | 4.58 | -2.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.00 | 18.13 | -10.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MMIT vs. QAI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MMIT drawdown since its inception was -12.28%, smaller than the maximum QAI drawdown of -14.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMIT and QAI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MMIT | QAI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.28% | -14.95% | +2.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.59% | -3.71% | +1.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.96% | -7.78% | +3.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.28% | -14.32% | +2.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -14.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.56% | 0.00% | -0.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.26% | -2.57% | +0.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.77% | 0.94% | -0.17% |
Volatility
MMIT vs. QAI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for IQ MacKay Municipal Intermediate ETF (MMIT) is 0.68%, while IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF (QAI) has a volatility of 2.83%. This indicates that MMIT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QAI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MMIT | QAI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.68% | 2.83% | -2.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.69% | 5.49% | -3.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.53% | 6.47% | -3.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.55% | 6.64% | -3.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.29% | 6.22% | -1.93% |
MMIT vs. QAI - Expense Ratio Comparison
MMIT has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is lower than QAI's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
MMIT vs. QAI - Dividend Comparison
MMIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.56%, more than QAI's 1.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MMIT IQ MacKay Municipal Intermediate ETF | 3.56% | 3.54% | 3.76% | 3.46% | 2.30% | 1.81% | 2.59% | 4.14% | 2.46% | 0.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QAI IQ Hedge Multi-Strategy Tracker ETF | 1.37% | 1.50% | 2.22% | 4.08% | 2.00% | 0.28% | 1.98% | 1.91% | 1.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MMIT and QAI have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QAI has higher volatility (2.83%) compared to MMIT (0.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MMIT dropped -12.28% vs QAI's -14.95%.
On 5-year performance, QAI leads with 4.75% vs 1.19% for MMIT. On fees, MMIT is cheaper at 0.31% per year. On volatility, MMIT has been the lower-risk option at 0.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QAI has performed better with a 4.75% return vs 1.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MMIT is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for QAI.
MMIT has the higher dividend yield at 3.56%, compared with 1.37% for QAI.
MMIT is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while QAI is Long-Short. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for MMIT and 0.79% for QAI.
QAI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 2.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MMIT and QAI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer