MLPX vs. SMH

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

MLPX (Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MLPX is a MLPs fund tracking the Solactive MLP & Energy Infrastructure Index, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MLPX returned 12.72%/yr vs 37.49%/yr for SMH. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MLPX charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.

Performance

MLPX vs. SMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLPX achieves a 25.23% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 72.15% return. Over the past 10 years, MLPX has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 12.72%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 37.49% annualized return.

MLPX

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: -1.75%
• YTD: 25.23%
• 6M: 25.77%
• 1Y: 24.35%
• 3Y*: 28.72%
• 5Y*: 20.50%
• 10Y*: 12.72%

SMH

• 1D: 1.72%
• 1M: 7.20%
• YTD: 72.15%
• 6M: 75.62%
• 1Y: 141.99%
• 3Y*: 60.05%
• 5Y*: 38.42%
• 10Y*: 37.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLPX vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MLPX Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF	25.23%	4.96%	42.90%	15.77%	21.54%	39.63%	-20.32%	19.04%	-15.64%	-4.53%
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF	72.15%	49.17%	39.10%	73.38%	-33.53%	42.13%	55.53%	64.45%	-9.05%	38.48%

Correlation

The correlation between MLPX and SMH is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.07
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.16
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.28
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2013	0.35

The correlation between MLPX and SMH shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.35 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MLPX vs. SMH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MLPX	SMH
Energy	99.6%	-
Utilities	0.3%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	100.0%

Return for Risk

MLPX vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLPX

MLPX Risk / Return Rank: 56
MLPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
MLPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
MLPX Omega Ratio Rank: 51
MLPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
MLPX Martin Ratio Rank: 51

SMH

SMH Risk / Return Rank: 96
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 94
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLPX vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MLPX	SMH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.65	4.13	-2.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.30	4.26	-1.96
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.60	-0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.07	9.18	-6.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.67	33.74	-26.06

MLPX vs. SMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is lower than the SMH Sharpe Ratio of 4.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLPX and SMH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MLPX vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLPX drawdown since its inception was -70.67%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLPX and SMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	MLPX	SMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.67%	-84.96%	+14.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.18%	-14.93%	+6.75%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.77%	-35.74%	+18.97%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.72%	-45.30%	+25.58%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-64.70%	-45.30%	-19.40%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.43%	-2.81%	-1.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.60%	-41.04%	+24.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.26%	4.06%	-0.80%

Volatility

MLPX vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX) is 5.77%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 16.25%. This indicates that MLPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MLPX	SMH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.77%	16.25%	-10.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.69%	27.73%	-16.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.23%	33.20%	-17.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.08%	35.47%	-15.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.48%	32.82%	-6.34%

MLPX vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLPX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

MLPX vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison

MLPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.10%, more than SMH's 0.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MLPX Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF	4.10%	4.88%	4.30%	5.22%	5.23%	5.98%	8.32%	5.78%	5.77%	4.36%	5.50%	4.81%
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF	0.18%	0.31%	0.44%	0.60%	1.18%	0.51%	0.69%	1.50%	1.88%	1.43%	0.80%	2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MLPX and SMH in my portfolio?

MLPX and SMH have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MLPX or SMH?

SMH has higher volatility (16.25%) compared to MLPX (5.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLPX dropped -70.67% vs SMH's -84.96%.

Which ETF is better, MLPX or SMH?

On 10-year performance, SMH leads with 37.49% vs 12.72% for MLPX. On fees, SMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, MLPX has been the lower-risk option at 5.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MLPX or SMH?

Over the 10-year period, SMH has performed better with a 37.49% return vs 12.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MLPX or SMH?

SMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for MLPX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MLPX or SMH?

MLPX has the higher dividend yield at 4.10%, compared with 0.18% for SMH.

What is the main difference between MLPX and SMH?

MLPX is categorized as MLPs, while SMH is Semiconductors. MLPX tracks Solactive MLP & Energy Infrastructure Index, while SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for MLPX and 0.35% for SMH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.13 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.