PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MLP vs. PSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MLP vs. PSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Maui Land & Pineapple Company, Inc. (MLP) and Phillips 66 (PSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLP achieves a -2.89% return, which is significantly lower than PSX's 43.67% return. Over the past 10 years, MLP has underperformed PSX with an annualized return of 10.04%, while PSX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.75% annualized return.


MLP

1D
-0.54%
1M
6.40%
YTD
-2.89%
6M
3.98%
1Y
6.13%
3Y*
11.09%
5Y*
8.90%
10Y*
10.04%

PSX

1D
1.29%
1M
4.37%
YTD
43.67%
6M
34.77%
1Y
65.22%
3Y*
27.76%
5Y*
19.84%
10Y*
12.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLP vs. PSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MLP
Maui Land & Pineapple Company, Inc.
-2.89%-22.93%38.33%68.68%-5.42%-13.62%2.49%13.41%-42.66%140.28%
PSX
Phillips 66
43.67%17.51%-11.63%33.07%49.58%8.51%-33.85%33.97%-12.28%20.94%

Correlation

The correlation between MLP and PSX is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 2, 2012

0.14

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MLP:

$328.67M

PSX:

$73.62B

EPS

MLP:

-$0.53

PSX:

$10.17

PS Ratio

MLP:

16.89

PSX:

0.55

PB Ratio

MLP:

9.94

PSX:

2.58

Total Revenue (TTM)

MLP:

$19.46M

PSX:

$134.70B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MLP:

$9.09M

PSX:

$5.94B

EBITDA (TTM)

MLP:

-$11.95M

PSX:

$9.17B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MLP vs. PSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLP
MLP Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
MLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLP Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
MLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLP Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

PSX
PSX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
PSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
PSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLP vs. PSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Maui Land & Pineapple Company, Inc. (MLP) and Phillips 66 (PSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MLPPSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.16

2.21

-2.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.57

2.87

-2.30

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.36

-0.30

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.12

3.84

-3.72

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

0.23

11.14

-10.91

MLP vs. PSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLP Sharpe Ratio is 0.16, which is lower than the PSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLP and PSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MLPPSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

2.21

-2.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

0.60

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

0.36

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.03

0.50

-0.48

Drawdowns

MLP vs. PSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLP drawdown since its inception was -95.97%, which is greater than PSX's maximum drawdown of -64.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLP and PSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MLPPSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.97%

-64.21%

-31.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.79%

-17.28%

-11.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.52%

-44.37%

-1.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.52%

-44.37%

-1.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.73%

-64.21%

-5.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-65.09%

-2.33%

-62.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-55.64%

-14.75%

-40.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.77%

5.96%

+9.81%

Volatility

MLP vs. PSX - Volatility Comparison

Maui Land & Pineapple Company, Inc. (MLP) has a higher volatility of 15.32% compared to Phillips 66 (PSX) at 9.68%. This indicates that MLP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MLPPSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.32%

9.68%

+5.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.72%

23.73%

-2.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.12%

29.65%

+9.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.31%

33.22%

+5.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.92%

35.32%

+8.60%

Dividends

MLP vs. PSX - Dividend Comparison

MLP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MLP
Maui Land & Pineapple Company, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PSX
Phillips 66
2.71%3.68%3.95%3.15%3.68%5.00%5.15%3.14%3.60%2.70%2.84%2.67%

Financials

MLP vs. PSX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Maui Land & Pineapple Company, Inc. and Phillips 66. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B20222023202420252026
4.53M
33.00B
(MLP) Total Revenue
(PSX) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MLP vs. PSX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Maui Land & Pineapple Company, Inc. and Phillips 66 over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
97.8%
0
Portfolio components
MLP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Maui Land & Pineapple Company, Inc. reported a gross profit of 4.42M and revenue of 4.53M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 97.8%.

PSX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Phillips 66 reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 33.00B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

MLP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Maui Land & Pineapple Company, Inc. reported an operating income of -4.27M and revenue of 4.53M, resulting in an operating margin of -94.3%.

PSX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Phillips 66 reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 33.00B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

MLP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Maui Land & Pineapple Company, Inc. reported a net income of -1.18M and revenue of 4.53M, resulting in a net margin of -26.1%.

PSX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Phillips 66 reported a net income of 207.00M and revenue of 33.00B, resulting in a net margin of 0.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MLP and PSX have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MLP has higher volatility (15.32%) compared to PSX (9.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLP dropped -95.97% vs PSX's -64.21%.

PSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MLP and PSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer