MLOZX vs. PAXDX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc. (MLOZX) and Pax Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund (PAXDX).

MLOZX is managed by Cohen & Steers. It was launched on Dec 19, 2013. PAXDX is managed by Pax World. It was launched on Dec 15, 2016.

Performance

MLOZX vs. PAXDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc. (MLOZX) and Pax Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund (PAXDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MLOZX vs. PAXDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MLOZX Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc.	27.86%	17.35%	12.16%	10.49%	21.10%	39.09%	-26.70%	12.62%	-13.43%	0.33%
PAXDX Pax Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund	5.11%	18.37%	-1.55%	9.33%	-13.45%	14.24%	14.25%	25.88%	-4.25%	19.24%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLOZX achieves a 27.86% return, which is significantly higher than PAXDX's 5.11% return.

MLOZX

• 1D: -0.56%
• 1M: 7.55%
• YTD: 27.86%
• 6M: 33.46%
• 1Y: 50.75%
• 3Y*: 22.70%
• 5Y*: 21.24%
• 10Y*: 11.89%

PAXDX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 5.11%
• 6M: 4.86%
• 1Y: 15.85%
• 3Y*: 8.60%
• 5Y*: 4.21%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLOZX vs. PAXDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLOZX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than PAXDX's 0.83% expense ratio.

MLOZX

Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc.

PAXDX

Pax Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund

Return for Risk

MLOZX vs. PAXDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLOZX

MLOZX Risk / Return Rank: 95
MLOZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
MLOZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
MLOZX Omega Ratio Rank: 95
MLOZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
MLOZX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

PAXDX

PAXDX Risk / Return Rank: 81
PAXDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
PAXDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
PAXDX Omega Ratio Rank: 80
PAXDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
PAXDX Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLOZX vs. PAXDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc. (MLOZX) and Pax Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund (PAXDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MLOZX	PAXDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.59	1.42	+1.17
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.10	1.98	+1.12
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.31	+0.20
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.05	1.95	+1.09
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.54	9.47	+4.07
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MLOZX vs. PAXDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLOZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is higher than the PAXDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLOZX and PAXDX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MLOZX	PAXDX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.59	1.42	+1.17
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.17	0.32	+0.85
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.49	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.27	0.52	-0.25

Correlation

The correlation between MLOZX and PAXDX is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

MLOZX vs. PAXDX - Dividend Comparison

MLOZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, less than PAXDX's 2.06% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MLOZX Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc.	1.09%	1.71%	10.24%	4.61%	3.66%	3.08%	6.57%	6.21%	4.44%	3.86%	3.72%	6.05%
PAXDX Pax Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund	2.06%	2.17%	2.07%	2.43%	2.48%	58.94%	2.88%	4.69%	3.55%	2.13%	0.12%	0.00%

Drawdowns

MLOZX vs. PAXDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLOZX drawdown since its inception was -72.01%, which is greater than PAXDX's maximum drawdown of -33.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLOZX and PAXDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MLOZX	PAXDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-72.01%	-33.58%	-38.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.08%	-8.05%	-8.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.84%	-25.04%	+4.20%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-64.94%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.56%	-0.74%	+0.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.92%	-5.34%	-15.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.62%	1.66%	+1.96%

Volatility

MLOZX vs. PAXDX - Volatility Comparison

Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc. (MLOZX) has a higher volatility of 4.54% compared to Pax Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund (PAXDX) at 0.00%. This indicates that MLOZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAXDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MLOZX	PAXDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.54%	0.00%	+4.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.97%	5.36%	+5.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.02%	11.81%	+8.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.26%	13.30%	+4.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.17%	16.65%	+7.52%