MLOZX vs. MAGRX
MLOZX (Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc.) and MAGRX (BlackRock Natural Resources Trust Fund) are both Energy Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, MLOZX returned 10.37%/yr vs 9.15%/yr for MAGRX. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MLOZX charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for MAGRX.
Performance
MLOZX vs. MAGRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MLOZX achieves a 32.43% return, which is significantly higher than MAGRX's 9.17% return. Over the past 10 years, MLOZX has outperformed MAGRX with an annualized return of 10.37%, while MAGRX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.15% annualized return.
MLOZX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -2.53%
- YTD
- 32.43%
- 6M
- 32.43%
- 1Y
- 50.89%
- 3Y*
- 23.88%
- 5Y*
- 18.96%
- 10Y*
- 10.37%
MAGRX
- 1D
- -1.75%
- 1M
- -6.16%
- YTD
- 9.17%
- 6M
- 8.63%
- 1Y
- 29.91%
- 3Y*
- 12.39%
- 5Y*
- 10.29%
- 10Y*
- 9.15%
MLOZX vs. MAGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLOZX Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc. | 32.43% | 17.35% | 12.16% | 10.49% | 21.10% | 39.09% | -26.70% | 12.62% | -13.43% | 0.33% |
MAGRX BlackRock Natural Resources Trust Fund | 9.17% | 30.26% | -5.65% | -1.36% | 17.20% | 30.76% | 3.20% | 15.34% | -17.95% | 8.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between MLOZX and MAGRX is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2013 | 0.75 |
The correlation between MLOZX and MAGRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.77 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MLOZX vs. MAGRX — Risk / Return Rank
MLOZX
MAGRX
MLOZX vs. MAGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc. (MLOZX) and BlackRock Natural Resources Trust Fund (MAGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MLOZX | MAGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.60 | 1.29 | +0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.56 | 2.77 | +7.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 30.43 | 9.15 | +21.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MLOZX vs. MAGRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLOZX drawdown since its inception was -72.01%, which is greater than MAGRX's maximum drawdown of -65.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLOZX and MAGRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MLOZX | MAGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.01% | -65.68% | -6.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.71% | -10.54% | +5.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.84% | -19.46% | -1.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.84% | -26.30% | +5.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.94% | -50.11% | -14.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.19% | -10.54% | +7.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.57% | -15.92% | -4.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.63% | 3.18% | -1.55% |
Volatility
MLOZX vs. MAGRX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc. (MLOZX) is 4.22%, while BlackRock Natural Resources Trust Fund (MAGRX) has a volatility of 5.65%. This indicates that MLOZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MAGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MLOZX | MAGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.22% | 5.65% | -1.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.46% | 13.82% | -2.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.62% | 17.41% | -2.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.33% | 21.00% | -2.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.09% | 22.50% | +1.59% |
MLOZX vs. MAGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MLOZX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than MAGRX's 0.87% expense ratio.
Dividends
MLOZX vs. MAGRX - Dividend Comparison
MLOZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.84%, less than MAGRX's 7.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAGRX BlackRock Natural Resources Trust Fund | 7.73% | 8.44% | 3.32% | 4.16% | 10.86% | 3.90% | 2.07% | 2.97% | 20.12% | 49.72% | 0.87% | 8.29% |
MLOZX Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc. | 1.84% | 1.71% | 10.24% | 4.61% | 3.66% | 3.08% | 6.57% | 6.21% | 4.44% | 3.86% | 3.72% | 6.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MLOZX and MAGRX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MAGRX has higher volatility (5.65%) compared to MLOZX (4.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLOZX dropped -72.01% vs MAGRX's -65.68%.
MLOZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.40 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MLOZX and MAGRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer