MLOZX vs. FSENX
Compare and contrast key facts about Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc. (MLOZX) and Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio (FSENX).
MLOZX is managed by Cohen & Steers. It was launched on Dec 19, 2013. FSENX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jul 14, 1981.
Performance
MLOZX vs. FSENX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MLOZX vs. FSENX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLOZX Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc. | 27.86% | 17.35% | 12.16% | 10.49% | 21.10% | 39.09% | -26.70% | 12.62% | -13.43% | 0.33% |
FSENX Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio | 40.53% | 10.56% | 4.26% | 0.94% | 62.98% | 55.31% | -32.51% | 9.90% | -24.94% | -2.65% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MLOZX achieves a 27.86% return, which is significantly lower than FSENX's 40.53% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MLOZX having a 11.89% annualized return and FSENX not far behind at 11.42%.
MLOZX
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- 7.55%
- YTD
- 27.86%
- 6M
- 33.46%
- 1Y
- 50.75%
- 3Y*
- 22.70%
- 5Y*
- 21.24%
- 10Y*
- 11.89%
FSENX
- 1D
- -1.22%
- 1M
- 10.46%
- YTD
- 40.53%
- 6M
- 42.43%
- 1Y
- 47.28%
- 3Y*
- 19.38%
- 5Y*
- 26.59%
- 10Y*
- 11.42%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MLOZX vs. FSENX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MLOZX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than FSENX's 0.77% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MLOZX vs. FSENX — Risk / Return Rank
MLOZX
FSENX
MLOZX vs. FSENX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc. (MLOZX) and Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio (FSENX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MLOZX | FSENX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.59 | 1.98 | +0.61 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.10 | 2.47 | +0.63 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.37 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.05 | 2.37 | +0.68 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.54 | 8.33 | +5.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MLOZX | FSENX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.59 | 1.98 | +0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.17 | 0.98 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.37 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.33 | -0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between MLOZX and FSENX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MLOZX vs. FSENX - Dividend Comparison
MLOZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, less than FSENX's 1.38% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLOZX Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc. | 1.09% | 1.71% | 10.24% | 4.61% | 3.66% | 3.08% | 6.57% | 6.21% | 4.44% | 3.86% | 3.72% | 6.05% |
FSENX Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio | 1.38% | 1.95% | 1.95% | 1.98% | 2.50% | 2.25% | 3.43% | 1.84% | 1.48% | 1.74% | 0.62% | 1.29% |
Drawdowns
MLOZX vs. FSENX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLOZX drawdown since its inception was -72.01%, smaller than the maximum FSENX drawdown of -76.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLOZX and FSENX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MLOZX | FSENX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.01% | -76.24% | +4.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.08% | -19.96% | +3.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.84% | -28.02% | +7.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.94% | -72.11% | +7.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.56% | -1.22% | +0.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.92% | -17.06% | -3.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.62% | 5.69% | -2.07% |
Volatility
MLOZX vs. FSENX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc. (MLOZX) is 4.54%, while Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio (FSENX) has a volatility of 5.09%. This indicates that MLOZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSENX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MLOZX | FSENX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.54% | 5.09% | -0.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.97% | 13.62% | -2.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.02% | 24.68% | -4.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.26% | 27.41% | -9.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.17% | 30.99% | -6.82% |