FNARX vs. VB

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

FNARX (Fidelity Natural Resources Fund) and VB (Vanguard Small-Cap ETF) are both funds - FNARX is a Energy Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while VB is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Small Cap Index. Over the past 10 years, FNARX returned 10.06%/yr vs 11.79%/yr for VB. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FNARX charges 0.82%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VB.

Performance

FNARX vs. VB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Natural Resources Fund (FNARX) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FNARX having a 16.45% return and VB slightly lower at 15.68%. Over the past 10 years, FNARX has underperformed VB with an annualized return of 10.06%, while VB has yielded a comparatively higher 11.79% annualized return.

FNARX

• 1D: -1.82%
• 1M: -7.76%
• YTD: 16.45%
• 6M: 16.63%
• 1Y: 30.28%
• 3Y*: 18.66%
• 5Y*: 20.30%
• 10Y*: 10.06%

VB

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: 2.83%
• YTD: 15.68%
• 6M: 13.00%
• 1Y: 30.17%
• 3Y*: 17.54%
• 5Y*: 7.39%
• 10Y*: 11.79%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FNARX vs. VB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FNARX Fidelity Natural Resources Fund	16.45%	28.67%	3.76%	6.41%	41.01%	39.34%	-20.86%	19.09%	-24.28%	-0.11%
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF	15.68%	8.87%	14.17%	18.22%	-17.51%	17.57%	19.19%	27.34%	-9.34%	16.26%

Correlation

The correlation between FNARX and VB is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.31
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.45
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.52
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004	0.65

Over the past year, the correlation between FNARX and VB has dropped to 0.31 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FNARX vs. VB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FNARX

FNARX Risk / Return Rank: 48
FNARX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
FNARX Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
FNARX Omega Ratio Rank: 35
FNARX Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
FNARX Martin Ratio Rank: 64

VB

VB Risk / Return Rank: 60
VB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
VB Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
VB Omega Ratio Rank: 52
VB Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
VB Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FNARX vs. VB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Natural Resources Fund (FNARX) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FNARX	VB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.74	1.82	-0.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.36	2.59	-0.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.31	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.91	3.38	-0.46
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.76	12.38	-0.62

FNARX vs. VB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNARX Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is comparable to the VB Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNARX and VB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FNARX vs. VB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNARX drawdown since its inception was -71.04%, which is greater than VB's maximum drawdown of -59.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNARX and VB.

Drawdown Indicators

	FNARX	VB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.04%	-59.56%	-11.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.68%	-8.98%	-1.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.64%	-25.36%	+4.72%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.93%	-28.15%	-1.78%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-64.10%	-42.05%	-22.05%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.68%	-0.39%	-10.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.03%	-8.42%	-11.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.64%	2.44%	+0.20%

Volatility

FNARX vs. VB - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Natural Resources Fund (FNARX) has a higher volatility of 6.01% compared to Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) at 4.92%. This indicates that FNARX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FNARX	VB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.01%	4.92%	+1.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.66%	12.21%	+2.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.94%	16.66%	+1.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.01%	20.78%	+4.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.93%	21.45%	+5.48%

FNARX vs. VB - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNARX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than VB's 0.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

FNARX vs. VB - Dividend Comparison

FNARX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, more than VB's 1.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNARX Fidelity Natural Resources Fund	1.89%	1.89%	1.51%	1.60%	2.42%	1.46%	1.79%	1.42%	1.17%	1.38%	0.62%	0.78%
VB Vanguard Small-Cap ETF	1.18%	1.33%	1.30%	1.55%	1.59%	1.24%	1.14%	1.39%	1.67%	1.35%	1.50%	1.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FNARX and VB in my portfolio?

FNARX and VB have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FNARX or VB?

FNARX has higher volatility (6.01%) compared to VB (4.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNARX dropped -71.04% vs VB's -59.56%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.