MLOZX vs. CSRSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc. (MLOZX) and Cohen & Steers Realty Shares Fund (CSRSX).
MLOZX is managed by Cohen & Steers. It was launched on Dec 19, 2013. CSRSX is managed by Cohen & Steers. It was launched on Jul 2, 1991.
Performance
MLOZX vs. CSRSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MLOZX vs. CSRSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLOZX Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc. | 27.86% | 17.35% | 12.16% | 10.49% | 21.10% | 39.09% | -26.70% | 12.62% | -13.43% | 0.33% |
CSRSX Cohen & Steers Realty Shares Fund | 1.77% | 2.84% | 6.35% | 12.70% | -24.94% | 42.25% | -2.87% | 33.12% | -5.10% | 7.09% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MLOZX achieves a 27.86% return, which is significantly higher than CSRSX's 1.77% return. Over the past 10 years, MLOZX has outperformed CSRSX with an annualized return of 11.89%, while CSRSX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.01% annualized return.
MLOZX
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- 7.55%
- YTD
- 27.86%
- 6M
- 33.46%
- 1Y
- 50.75%
- 3Y*
- 22.70%
- 5Y*
- 21.24%
- 10Y*
- 11.89%
CSRSX
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -7.10%
- YTD
- 1.77%
- 6M
- -0.98%
- 1Y
- 1.43%
- 3Y*
- 7.00%
- 5Y*
- 4.29%
- 10Y*
- 6.01%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MLOZX vs. CSRSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MLOZX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than CSRSX's 0.88% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MLOZX vs. CSRSX — Risk / Return Rank
MLOZX
CSRSX
MLOZX vs. CSRSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc. (MLOZX) and Cohen & Steers Realty Shares Fund (CSRSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MLOZX | CSRSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.59 | 0.14 | +2.45 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.10 | 0.30 | +2.80 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.04 | +0.47 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.05 | 0.19 | +2.85 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.54 | 0.67 | +12.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MLOZX | CSRSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.59 | 0.14 | +2.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.17 | 0.23 | +0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.29 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.44 | -0.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between MLOZX and CSRSX is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
MLOZX vs. CSRSX - Dividend Comparison
MLOZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, less than CSRSX's 2.30% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLOZX Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc. | 1.09% | 1.71% | 10.24% | 4.61% | 3.66% | 3.08% | 6.57% | 6.21% | 4.44% | 3.86% | 3.72% | 6.05% |
CSRSX Cohen & Steers Realty Shares Fund | 2.30% | 3.00% | 2.60% | 3.50% | 7.52% | 3.68% | 4.73% | 16.29% | 5.36% | 8.88% | 13.49% | 13.37% |
Drawdowns
MLOZX vs. CSRSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLOZX drawdown since its inception was -72.01%, roughly equal to the maximum CSRSX drawdown of -72.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLOZX and CSRSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MLOZX | CSRSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.01% | -72.51% | +0.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.08% | -11.35% | -4.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.84% | -31.65% | +10.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.94% | -41.66% | -23.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.56% | -7.50% | +6.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.92% | -9.87% | -11.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.62% | 3.28% | +0.34% |
Volatility
MLOZX vs. CSRSX - Volatility Comparison
Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc. (MLOZX) has a higher volatility of 4.54% compared to Cohen & Steers Realty Shares Fund (CSRSX) at 4.30%. This indicates that MLOZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSRSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MLOZX | CSRSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.54% | 4.30% | +0.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.97% | 9.79% | +1.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.02% | 16.04% | +3.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.26% | 18.63% | -0.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.17% | 20.55% | +3.62% |