PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MLOZX vs. CSRSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MLOZX vs. CSRSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc. (MLOZX) and Cohen & Steers Realty Shares Fund (CSRSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLOZX achieves a 36.18% return, which is significantly higher than CSRSX's 11.55% return. Over the past 10 years, MLOZX has outperformed CSRSX with an annualized return of 10.55%, while CSRSX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.99% annualized return.


MLOZX

1D
1.79%
1M
1.71%
YTD
36.18%
6M
33.41%
1Y
58.83%
3Y*
25.68%
5Y*
19.48%
10Y*
10.55%

CSRSX

1D
0.39%
1M
-0.94%
YTD
11.55%
6M
10.41%
1Y
10.89%
3Y*
10.40%
5Y*
3.84%
10Y*
6.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLOZX vs. CSRSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MLOZX
Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc.
36.18%17.35%12.16%10.49%21.10%39.09%-26.70%12.62%-13.43%0.33%
CSRSX
Cohen & Steers Realty Shares Fund
11.55%2.84%6.35%12.70%-24.94%42.25%-2.87%33.12%-5.10%7.09%

Correlation

The correlation between MLOZX and CSRSX is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 24, 2013

0.39

Over the past year, the correlation between MLOZX and CSRSX has dropped to 0.15 - well below their long-term average of 0.39, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MLOZX vs. CSRSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLOZX
MLOZX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
MLOZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLOZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLOZX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
MLOZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLOZX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

CSRSX
CSRSX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
CSRSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSRSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSRSX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
CSRSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSRSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLOZX vs. CSRSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc. (MLOZX) and Cohen & Steers Realty Shares Fund (CSRSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MLOZXCSRSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.73

1.14

+0.58

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

13.16

1.36

+11.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

40.52

3.52

+37.00

MLOZX vs. CSRSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLOZX Sharpe Ratio is 4.27, which is higher than the CSRSX Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLOZX and CSRSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MLOZXCSRSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.27

0.78

+3.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.07

0.21

+0.86

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.34

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.45

-0.16

Drawdowns

MLOZX vs. CSRSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLOZX drawdown since its inception was -72.01%, roughly equal to the maximum CSRSX drawdown of -72.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLOZX and CSRSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MLOZXCSRSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.01%

-72.51%

+0.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.71%

-7.78%

+3.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.84%

-17.02%

-3.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.84%

-31.65%

+10.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.94%

-41.66%

-23.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.08%

-2.87%

+2.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.64%

-9.82%

-10.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.52%

2.99%

-1.47%

Volatility

MLOZX vs. CSRSX - Volatility Comparison

Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc. (MLOZX) has a higher volatility of 5.09% compared to Cohen & Steers Realty Shares Fund (CSRSX) at 3.69%. This indicates that MLOZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSRSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MLOZXCSRSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.09%

3.69%

+1.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.23%

10.15%

+1.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.51%

13.49%

+1.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.36%

18.65%

-0.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.10%

20.57%

+3.53%

MLOZX vs. CSRSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MLOZX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than CSRSX's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

MLOZX vs. CSRSX - Dividend Comparison

MLOZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, less than CSRSX's 2.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSRSX
Cohen & Steers Realty Shares Fund
2.75%3.00%2.60%3.50%7.52%3.68%4.73%16.29%5.36%8.88%13.49%13.37%
MLOZX
Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc.
1.79%1.71%10.24%4.61%3.66%3.08%6.57%6.21%4.44%3.86%3.72%6.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


MLOZX and CSRSX have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MLOZX has higher volatility (5.09%) compared to CSRSX (3.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLOZX dropped -72.01% vs CSRSX's -72.51%.

MLOZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.27 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MLOZX and CSRSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer