MLOZX vs. BGLYX
Compare and contrast key facts about Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc. (MLOZX) and Brookfield Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (BGLYX).
MLOZX is managed by Cohen & Steers. It was launched on Dec 19, 2013. BGLYX is managed by Brookfield Investment Funds. It was launched on Nov 29, 2011.
Performance
MLOZX vs. BGLYX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MLOZX vs. BGLYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLOZX Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc. | 27.86% | 17.35% | 12.16% | 10.49% | 21.10% | 39.09% | -26.70% | 12.62% | -13.43% | 0.33% |
BGLYX Brookfield Global Listed Infrastructure Fund | 8.53% | 13.04% | 9.01% | 3.32% | -5.47% | 16.13% | -3.25% | 25.44% | -8.06% | 10.79% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MLOZX achieves a 27.86% return, which is significantly higher than BGLYX's 8.53% return. Over the past 10 years, MLOZX has outperformed BGLYX with an annualized return of 11.89%, while BGLYX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.28% annualized return.
MLOZX
- 1D
- -0.56%
- 1M
- 7.55%
- YTD
- 27.86%
- 6M
- 33.46%
- 1Y
- 50.75%
- 3Y*
- 22.70%
- 5Y*
- 21.24%
- 10Y*
- 11.89%
BGLYX
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- -4.56%
- YTD
- 8.53%
- 6M
- 9.80%
- 1Y
- 17.54%
- 3Y*
- 10.89%
- 5Y*
- 8.15%
- 10Y*
- 7.28%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MLOZX vs. BGLYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MLOZX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than BGLYX's 1.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MLOZX vs. BGLYX — Risk / Return Rank
MLOZX
BGLYX
MLOZX vs. BGLYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc. (MLOZX) and Brookfield Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (BGLYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MLOZX | BGLYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.59 | 1.52 | +1.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.10 | 2.04 | +1.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.29 | +0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.05 | 2.45 | +0.60 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.54 | 9.89 | +3.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MLOZX | BGLYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.59 | 1.52 | +1.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.17 | 0.61 | +0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.47 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.48 | -0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between MLOZX and BGLYX is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MLOZX vs. BGLYX - Dividend Comparison
MLOZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, less than BGLYX's 28.55% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLOZX Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc. | 1.09% | 1.71% | 10.24% | 4.61% | 3.66% | 3.08% | 6.57% | 6.21% | 4.44% | 3.86% | 3.72% | 6.05% |
BGLYX Brookfield Global Listed Infrastructure Fund | 28.55% | 30.30% | 1.89% | 1.88% | 7.34% | 4.53% | 3.71% | 3.94% | 4.31% | 4.03% | 4.09% | 4.03% |
Drawdowns
MLOZX vs. BGLYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLOZX drawdown since its inception was -72.01%, which is greater than BGLYX's maximum drawdown of -36.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLOZX and BGLYX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MLOZX | BGLYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.01% | -36.54% | -35.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.08% | -7.55% | -8.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.84% | -20.94% | +0.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.94% | -36.54% | -28.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.56% | -4.56% | +4.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.92% | -7.92% | -13.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.62% | 1.87% | +1.75% |
Volatility
MLOZX vs. BGLYX - Volatility Comparison
Cohen & Steers MLP & Energy Opportunity Fund, Inc. (MLOZX) has a higher volatility of 4.54% compared to Brookfield Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (BGLYX) at 3.90%. This indicates that MLOZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BGLYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MLOZX | BGLYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.54% | 3.90% | +0.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.97% | 7.35% | +3.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.02% | 12.09% | +7.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.26% | 13.46% | +4.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.17% | 15.62% | +8.55% |