BGLYX vs. NMFIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Brookfield Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (BGLYX) and Northern Multi-Manager Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (NMFIX).
BGLYX is managed by Brookfield Investment Funds. It was launched on Nov 29, 2011. NMFIX is managed by Northern Funds. It was launched on Sep 17, 2012.
Performance
BGLYX vs. NMFIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BGLYX vs. NMFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGLYX Brookfield Global Listed Infrastructure Fund | 9.75% | 13.04% | 9.01% | 3.32% | -5.47% | 16.13% | -3.25% | 25.44% | -8.06% | 10.79% |
NMFIX Northern Multi-Manager Global Listed Infrastructure Fund | 7.82% | 23.11% | 1.74% | 6.62% | -7.21% | 13.68% | -2.59% | 24.34% | -10.26% | 22.17% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BGLYX achieves a 9.75% return, which is significantly higher than NMFIX's 7.82% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BGLYX having a 7.40% annualized return and NMFIX not far ahead at 7.63%.
BGLYX
- 1D
- 1.12%
- 1M
- -3.19%
- YTD
- 9.75%
- 6M
- 10.88%
- 1Y
- 18.35%
- 3Y*
- 11.31%
- 5Y*
- 8.32%
- 10Y*
- 7.40%
NMFIX
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- -4.53%
- YTD
- 7.82%
- 6M
- 10.59%
- 1Y
- 23.48%
- 3Y*
- 11.51%
- 5Y*
- 7.99%
- 10Y*
- 7.63%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BGLYX vs. NMFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BGLYX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than NMFIX's 0.96% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BGLYX vs. NMFIX — Risk / Return Rank
BGLYX
NMFIX
BGLYX vs. NMFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookfield Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (BGLYX) and Northern Multi-Manager Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (NMFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BGLYX | NMFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.57 | 1.66 | -0.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.09 | 2.35 | -0.26 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.38 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.60 | 3.16 | -0.56 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.43 | 12.53 | -2.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BGLYX | NMFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.57 | 1.66 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 | 0.59 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.50 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.52 | -0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between BGLYX and NMFIX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BGLYX vs. NMFIX - Dividend Comparison
BGLYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.23%, more than NMFIX's 5.63% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGLYX Brookfield Global Listed Infrastructure Fund | 28.23% | 30.30% | 1.89% | 1.88% | 7.34% | 4.53% | 3.71% | 3.94% | 4.31% | 4.03% | 4.09% | 4.03% |
NMFIX Northern Multi-Manager Global Listed Infrastructure Fund | 5.63% | 6.03% | 3.82% | 2.78% | 3.98% | 10.13% | 2.11% | 2.47% | 10.33% | 7.71% | 2.53% | 2.01% |
Drawdowns
BGLYX vs. NMFIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGLYX drawdown since its inception was -36.54%, roughly equal to the maximum NMFIX drawdown of -34.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGLYX and NMFIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BGLYX | NMFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.54% | -34.93% | -1.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.55% | -7.81% | +0.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.94% | -22.76% | +1.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.54% | -34.93% | -1.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.48% | -4.84% | +1.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.92% | -5.34% | -2.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.88% | 1.97% | -0.09% |
Volatility
BGLYX vs. NMFIX - Volatility Comparison
Brookfield Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (BGLYX) and Northern Multi-Manager Global Listed Infrastructure Fund (NMFIX) have volatilities of 4.12% and 4.02%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BGLYX | NMFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.12% | 4.02% | +0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.42% | 10.46% | -3.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.11% | 14.55% | -2.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.47% | 13.73% | -0.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.62% | 15.44% | +0.18% |