PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MLCO vs. RRC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MLCO vs. RRC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited (MLCO) and Range Resources Corporation (RRC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLCO achieves a -24.04% return, which is significantly lower than RRC's 12.74% return. Over the past 10 years, MLCO has underperformed RRC with an annualized return of -7.08%, while RRC has yielded a comparatively higher -0.23% annualized return.


MLCO

1D
-1.54%
1M
5.31%
YTD
-24.04%
6M
-37.84%
1Y
-8.44%
3Y*
-20.97%
5Y*
-19.48%
10Y*
-7.08%

RRC

1D
-0.30%
1M
-6.97%
YTD
12.74%
6M
4.68%
1Y
2.89%
3Y*
13.32%
5Y*
23.39%
10Y*
-0.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLCO vs. RRC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MLCO
Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited
-24.04%30.74%-34.72%-22.87%12.97%-45.12%-22.55%41.19%-37.90%100.80%
RRC
Range Resources Corporation
12.74%-1.05%19.35%23.05%41.10%166.12%38.14%-48.60%-43.60%-50.15%

Correlation

The correlation between MLCO and RRC is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2006

0.21

The correlation between MLCO and RRC shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MLCO:

$2.26B

RRC:

$9.38B

EPS

MLCO:

$0.57

RRC:

$3.78

PE Ratio

MLCO:

10.02

RRC:

10.49

PEG Ratio

MLCO:

0.15

RRC:

0.17

PS Ratio

MLCO:

0.43

RRC:

2.98

Total Revenue (TTM)

MLCO:

$5.30B

RRC:

$3.18B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MLCO:

$1.81B

RRC:

$689.78M

EBITDA (TTM)

MLCO:

$1.19B

RRC:

$1.61B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MLCO vs. RRC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLCO
MLCO Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
MLCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLCO Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
MLCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLCO Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

RRC
RRC Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
RRC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RRC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
RRC Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
RRC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
RRC Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLCO vs. RRC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited (MLCO) and Range Resources Corporation (RRC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MLCORRCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.21

0.09

-0.30

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.01

0.34

-0.36

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.04

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.18

0.22

-0.40

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.29

0.37

-0.67

MLCO vs. RRC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLCO Sharpe Ratio is -0.21, which is lower than the RRC Sharpe Ratio of 0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLCO and RRC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MLCORRCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.21

0.09

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.33

0.52

-0.85

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.14

-0.00

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.09

0.16

-0.25

Drawdowns

MLCO vs. RRC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLCO drawdown since its inception was -89.50%, smaller than the maximum RRC drawdown of -97.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLCO and RRC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MLCORRCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.50%

-97.86%

+8.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.58%

-24.15%

-23.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-66.52%

-28.03%

-38.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-74.37%

-37.66%

-36.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-85.55%

-95.72%

+10.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-84.05%

-54.60%

-29.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-55.04%

-46.60%

-8.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.66%

14.09%

+14.57%

Volatility

MLCO vs. RRC - Volatility Comparison

Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited (MLCO) has a higher volatility of 9.41% compared to Range Resources Corporation (RRC) at 7.81%. This indicates that MLCO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RRC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MLCORRCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.41%

7.81%

+1.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.06%

23.00%

+7.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.84%

32.42%

+8.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

58.60%

45.21%

+13.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.96%

56.52%

-4.56%

Dividends

MLCO vs. RRC - Dividend Comparison

MLCO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RRC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MLCO
Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.88%2.62%3.14%5.76%4.52%0.68%
RRC
Range Resources Corporation
0.93%1.02%0.89%1.05%0.64%0.00%0.00%1.65%0.84%0.47%0.23%0.65%

Financials

MLCO vs. RRC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited and Range Resources Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B1.40B1.60B20222023202420252026
1.37B
1.03B
(MLCO) Total Revenue
(RRC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MLCO vs. RRC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited and Range Resources Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
27.2%
0
Portfolio components
MLCO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited reported a gross profit of 373.22M and revenue of 1.37B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.2%.

RRC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Range Resources Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.03B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

MLCO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited reported an operating income of 182.64M and revenue of 1.37B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.3%.

RRC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Range Resources Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 1.03B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

MLCO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited reported a net income of 77.06M and revenue of 1.37B, resulting in a net margin of 5.6%.

RRC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Range Resources Corporation reported a net income of 341.63M and revenue of 1.03B, resulting in a net margin of 33.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MLCO and RRC have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MLCO has higher volatility (9.41%) compared to RRC (7.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLCO dropped -89.50% vs RRC's -97.86%.

RRC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.09 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MLCO and RRC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer