MLCO vs. SGHC

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited (MLCO) and Super Group (SGHC) Limited (SGHC).

Performance

MLCO vs. SGHC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited (MLCO) and Super Group (SGHC) Limited (SGHC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MLCO vs. SGHC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
MLCO Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited	-23.78%	30.74%	-34.72%	-22.87%	15.46%
SGHC Super Group (SGHC) Limited	-5.79%	95.00%	107.65%	5.67%	-63.64%

Fundamentals

Market Cap MLCO : $759.85M SGHC : $5.55B
EPS MLCO : $1.38 SGHC : $0.40
PE Ratio MLCO : 4.18 SGHC : 27.53
PEG Ratio MLCO : 0.05 SGHC : 2.45
PS Ratio MLCO : 0.15 SGHC : 2.76
Total Revenue (TTM) MLCO : $5.16B SGHC : $2.00B
Gross Profit (TTM) MLCO : $1.90B SGHC : $1.05B
EBITDA (TTM) MLCO : $1.15B SGHC : $402.21M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLCO achieves a -23.78% return, which is significantly lower than SGHC's -5.79% return.

MLCO

• 1D: 1.58%
• 1M: -5.41%
• YTD: -23.78%
• 6M: -38.09%
• 1Y: 9.70%
• 3Y*: -23.18%
• 5Y*: -22.23%
• 10Y*: -8.42%

SGHC

• 1D: 1.02%
• 1M: -0.53%
• YTD: -5.79%
• 6M: -16.50%
• 1Y: 73.21%
• 3Y*: 44.24%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

MLCO vs. SGHC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLCO

MLCO Risk / Return Rank: 45
MLCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
MLCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
MLCO Omega Ratio Rank: 44
MLCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
MLCO Martin Ratio Rank: 45

SGHC

SGHC Risk / Return Rank: 79
SGHC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
SGHC Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
SGHC Omega Ratio Rank: 78
SGHC Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
SGHC Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLCO vs. SGHC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited (MLCO) and Super Group (SGHC) Limited (SGHC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MLCO	SGHC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.22	1.57	-1.34
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.60	2.24	-1.63
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.28	-0.20
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.20	2.04	-1.83
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.43	4.88	-4.45
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MLCO vs. SGHC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLCO Sharpe Ratio is 0.22, which is lower than the SGHC Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLCO and SGHC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MLCO	SGHC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.22	1.57	-1.34
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.38	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.16	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.09	0.16	-0.25

Correlation

The correlation between MLCO and SGHC is 0.22, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

MLCO vs. SGHC - Dividend Comparison

MLCO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SGHC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MLCO Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.88%	2.62%	3.14%	5.76%	4.52%	0.68%
SGHC Super Group (SGHC) Limited	3.85%	1.34%	4.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

MLCO vs. SGHC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLCO drawdown since its inception was -89.50%, which is greater than SGHC's maximum drawdown of -76.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLCO and SGHC.

Drawdown Indicators

	MLCO	SGHC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-89.50%	-76.02%	-13.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-46.79%	-37.67%	-9.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-78.88%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-85.55%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-84.00%	-19.82%	-64.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-54.78%	-47.31%	-7.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	22.26%	15.72%	+6.54%

Volatility

MLCO vs. SGHC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited (MLCO) is 8.35%, while Super Group (SGHC) Limited (SGHC) has a volatility of 11.32%. This indicates that MLCO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SGHC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MLCO	SGHC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.35%	11.32%	-2.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	30.55%	34.00%	-3.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	43.34%	47.04%	-3.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	58.43%	60.20%	-1.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	51.98%	60.20%	-8.22%

Financials

MLCO vs. SGHC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited and Super Group (SGHC) Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

MLCO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited reported a gross profit of 474.37M and revenue of 1.29B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.7%.

SGHC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Super Group (SGHC) Limited reported a gross profit of 158.43M and revenue of 474.45M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.4%.

MLCO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited reported an operating income of 146.39M and revenue of 1.29B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.3%.

SGHC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Super Group (SGHC) Limited reported an operating income of 120.10M and revenue of 474.45M, resulting in an operating margin of 25.3%.

MLCO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited reported a net income of 60.64M and revenue of 1.29B, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.

SGHC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Super Group (SGHC) Limited reported a net income of 81.77M and revenue of 474.45M, resulting in a net margin of 17.2%.