PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MLCO vs. SGHC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MLCO vs. SGHC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited (MLCO) and Super Group (SGHC) Limited (SGHC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MLCO achieves a -23.65% return, which is significantly lower than SGHC's 9.93% return.


MLCO

1D
0.52%
1M
5.86%
YTD
-23.65%
6M
-35.56%
1Y
-7.52%
3Y*
-20.83%
5Y*
-19.47%
10Y*
-7.04%

SGHC

1D
0.63%
1M
-1.16%
YTD
9.93%
6M
21.05%
1Y
52.45%
3Y*
64.50%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MLCO vs. SGHC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
MLCO
Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited
-23.65%30.74%-34.72%-22.87%15.46%
SGHC
Super Group (SGHC) Limited
9.93%95.00%107.65%5.67%-63.64%

Correlation

The correlation between MLCO and SGHC is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2022

0.22

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MLCO:

$2.27B

SGHC:

$6.44B

EPS

MLCO:

$0.57

SGHC:

$0.40

PE Ratio

MLCO:

10.08

SGHC:

31.56

PEG Ratio

MLCO:

0.15

SGHC:

1.34

PS Ratio

MLCO:

0.44

SGHC:

2.99

Total Revenue (TTM)

MLCO:

$5.30B

SGHC:

$2.15B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MLCO:

$1.81B

SGHC:

$617.43M

EBITDA (TTM)

MLCO:

$1.19B

SGHC:

$394.23M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MLCO vs. SGHC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MLCO
MLCO Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
MLCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MLCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
MLCO Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
MLCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
MLCO Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

SGHC
SGHC Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SGHC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGHC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGHC Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
SGHC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGHC Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MLCO vs. SGHC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited (MLCO) and Super Group (SGHC) Limited (SGHC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MLCOSGHCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.18

1.14

-1.32

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.02

1.83

-1.81

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.22

-0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.16

1.40

-1.56

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.26

3.21

-3.47

MLCO vs. SGHC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MLCO Sharpe Ratio is -0.18, which is lower than the SGHC Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MLCO and SGHC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MLCOSGHCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.18

1.14

-1.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.09

0.22

-0.32

Drawdowns

MLCO vs. SGHC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MLCO drawdown since its inception was -89.50%, which is greater than SGHC's maximum drawdown of -76.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLCO and SGHC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MLCOSGHCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.50%

-76.02%

-13.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.58%

-37.67%

-9.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-66.52%

-37.67%

-28.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-74.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-85.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-83.97%

-8.22%

-75.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-55.04%

-45.81%

-9.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.79%

16.37%

+12.42%

Volatility

MLCO vs. SGHC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited (MLCO) is 9.41%, while Super Group (SGHC) Limited (SGHC) has a volatility of 10.29%. This indicates that MLCO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SGHC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MLCOSGHCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.41%

10.29%

-0.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.88%

30.54%

-0.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

40.84%

46.38%

-5.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

58.59%

59.60%

-1.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.95%

59.60%

-7.65%

Dividends

MLCO vs. SGHC - Dividend Comparison

MLCO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SGHC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.30%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MLCO
Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.88%2.62%3.14%5.76%4.52%0.68%
SGHC
Super Group (SGHC) Limited
3.30%1.34%4.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

MLCO vs. SGHC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited and Super Group (SGHC) Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B1.40B20222023202420252026
1.37B
578.00M
(MLCO) Total Revenue
(SGHC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MLCO vs. SGHC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited and Super Group (SGHC) Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%20222023202420252026
27.2%
24.2%
Portfolio components
MLCO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited reported a gross profit of 373.22M and revenue of 1.37B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.2%.

SGHC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Super Group (SGHC) Limited reported a gross profit of 140.00M and revenue of 578.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.2%.

MLCO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited reported an operating income of 182.64M and revenue of 1.37B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.3%.

SGHC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Super Group (SGHC) Limited reported an operating income of 100.00M and revenue of 578.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.3%.

MLCO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited reported a net income of 77.06M and revenue of 1.37B, resulting in a net margin of 5.6%.

SGHC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Super Group (SGHC) Limited reported a net income of 67.00M and revenue of 578.00M, resulting in a net margin of 11.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MLCO and SGHC have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SGHC has higher volatility (10.29%) compared to MLCO (9.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLCO dropped -89.50% vs SGHC's -76.02%.

SGHC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.14 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MLCO and SGHC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer