MLCO vs. SGHC
MLCO (Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited) and SGHC (Super Group (SGHC) Limited) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — MLCO in Resorts & Casinos, SGHC in Gambling. Over the past 3 years, MLCO returned -20.97%/yr vs 64.15%/yr for SGHC. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MLCO vs. SGHC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MLCO achieves a -24.04% return, which is significantly lower than SGHC's 9.24% return.
MLCO
- 1D
- -1.54%
- 1M
- 5.31%
- YTD
- -24.04%
- 6M
- -37.84%
- 1Y
- -8.44%
- 3Y*
- -20.97%
- 5Y*
- -19.48%
- 10Y*
- -7.08%
SGHC
- 1D
- -2.77%
- 1M
- -1.86%
- YTD
- 9.24%
- 6M
- 19.85%
- 1Y
- 50.80%
- 3Y*
- 64.15%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MLCO vs. SGHC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLCO Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited | -24.04% | 30.74% | -34.72% | -22.87% | 15.46% |
SGHC Super Group (SGHC) Limited | 9.24% | 95.00% | 107.65% | 5.67% | -63.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between MLCO and SGHC is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2022 | 0.22 |
Fundamentals
MLCO:
$2.26B
SGHC:
$6.40B
MLCO:
$0.57
SGHC:
$0.40
MLCO:
10.02
SGHC:
31.37
MLCO:
0.15
SGHC:
1.33
MLCO:
0.43
SGHC:
2.97
MLCO:
$5.30B
SGHC:
$2.15B
MLCO:
$1.81B
SGHC:
$617.43M
MLCO:
$1.19B
SGHC:
$394.23M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MLCO vs. SGHC — Risk / Return Rank
MLCO
SGHC
MLCO vs. SGHC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited (MLCO) and Super Group (SGHC) Limited (SGHC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MLCO | SGHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.21 | 1.10 | -1.31 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.01 | 1.79 | -1.81 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.21 | -0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.18 | 1.35 | -1.53 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.29 | 3.11 | -3.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MLCO | SGHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.21 | 1.10 | -1.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.33 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.14 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.09 | 0.22 | -0.31 |
Drawdowns
MLCO vs. SGHC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MLCO drawdown since its inception was -89.50%, which is greater than SGHC's maximum drawdown of -76.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MLCO and SGHC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MLCO | SGHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.50% | -76.02% | -13.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.58% | -37.67% | -9.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -66.52% | -37.67% | -28.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -74.37% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -85.55% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -84.05% | -8.80% | -75.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -55.04% | -45.85% | -9.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.66% | 16.36% | +12.30% |
Volatility
MLCO vs. SGHC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited (MLCO) is 9.41%, while Super Group (SGHC) Limited (SGHC) has a volatility of 10.27%. This indicates that MLCO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SGHC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MLCO | SGHC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.41% | 10.27% | -0.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.06% | 30.55% | -0.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.84% | 46.38% | -5.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 58.60% | 59.63% | -1.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.96% | 59.63% | -7.67% |
Dividends
MLCO vs. SGHC - Dividend Comparison
MLCO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SGHC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.32%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLCO Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.88% | 2.62% | 3.14% | 5.76% | 4.52% | 0.68% |
SGHC Super Group (SGHC) Limited | 3.32% | 1.34% | 4.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
MLCO vs. SGHC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited and Super Group (SGHC) Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MLCO vs. SGHC - Profitability Comparison
MLCO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited reported a gross profit of 373.22M and revenue of 1.37B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.2%.
SGHC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Super Group (SGHC) Limited reported a gross profit of 140.00M and revenue of 578.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.2%.
MLCO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited reported an operating income of 182.64M and revenue of 1.37B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.3%.
SGHC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Super Group (SGHC) Limited reported an operating income of 100.00M and revenue of 578.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.3%.
MLCO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited reported a net income of 77.06M and revenue of 1.37B, resulting in a net margin of 5.6%.
SGHC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Super Group (SGHC) Limited reported a net income of 67.00M and revenue of 578.00M, resulting in a net margin of 11.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MLCO and SGHC have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SGHC has higher volatility (10.27%) compared to MLCO (9.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MLCO dropped -89.50% vs SGHC's -76.02%.
SGHC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.10 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MLCO and SGHC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer