ML.PA vs. CDNS
ML.PA (Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin Société en commandite par actions) and CDNS (Cadence Design Systems, Inc.) are both stocks. ML.PA operates in Auto Parts (Consumer Cyclical), while CDNS operates in Software - Application (Technology). Over the past 10 years, ML.PA returned 13.92%/yr vs 31.35%/yr for CDNS. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ML.PA vs. CDNS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ML.PA is traded in EUR, while CDNS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CDNS values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ML.PA achieves a 22.39% return, which is significantly lower than CDNS's 25.05% return. Over the past 10 years, ML.PA has underperformed CDNS with an annualized return of 13.92%, while CDNS has yielded a comparatively higher 31.35% annualized return.
ML.PA
- 1D
- 2.79%
- 1M
- 9.78%
- YTD
- 22.39%
- 6M
- 23.52%
- 1Y
- 6.08%
- 3Y*
- 10.25%
- 5Y*
- 7.11%
- 10Y*
- 13.92%
CDNS
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- 9.95%
- YTD
- 25.05%
- 6M
- 20.86%
- 1Y
- 25.27%
- 3Y*
- 14.53%
- 5Y*
- 25.53%
- 10Y*
- 31.35%
ML.PA vs. CDNS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ML.PA Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin Société en commandite par actions | 22.39% | -7.35% | 1.60% | 30.61% | -15.25% | 48.28% | 5.31% | 45.88% | -17.76% | 27.18% |
CDNS Cadence Design Systems, Inc. | 25.05% | -8.31% | 17.60% | 64.47% | -8.45% | 46.81% | 80.49% | 63.13% | 8.85% | 45.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between ML.PA and CDNS is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2007 | 0.24 |
The correlation between ML.PA and CDNS shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ML.PA vs. CDNS — Risk / Return Rank
ML.PA
CDNS
ML.PA vs. CDNS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin Société en commandite par actions (ML.PA) and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ML.PA | CDNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.15 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.29 | 0.84 | -0.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.63 | 1.71 | -1.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ML.PA vs. CDNS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ML.PA drawdown since its inception was -73.30%, smaller than the maximum CDNS drawdown of -88.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ML.PA and CDNS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ML.PA | CDNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.30% | -88.18% | +14.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.52% | -30.38% | +9.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.18% | -32.15% | +2.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.53% | -32.15% | -0.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.30% | -34.02% | -5.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.03% | -7.05% | +1.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.53% | -24.27% | +9.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.59% | 14.84% | -5.25% |
Volatility
ML.PA vs. CDNS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin Société en commandite par actions (ML.PA) is 5.26%, while Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) has a volatility of 15.98%. This indicates that ML.PA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CDNS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ML.PA | CDNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.26% | 15.98% | -10.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.74% | 31.51% | -14.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.80% | 39.10% | -16.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.61% | 35.98% | -11.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.62% | 34.38% | -7.76% |
Dividends
ML.PA vs. CDNS - Dividend Comparison
ML.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%, while CDNS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CDNS Cadence Design Systems, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ML.PA Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin Société en commandite par actions | 4.16% | 4.87% | 4.25% | 3.85% | 17.31% | 6.38% | 7.62% | 13.56% | 16.38% | 10.87% | 10.78% | 11.37% |
Financials
ML.PA vs. CDNS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin Société en commandite par actions and Cadence Design Systems, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
ML.PA and CDNS have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for ML.PA and CDNS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer