ML.PA vs. PIRC.MI
Compare and contrast key facts about Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin Société en commandite par actions (ML.PA) and Pirelli & C SPA (PIRC.MI).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ML.PA or PIRC.MI.
Key characteristics
| ML.PA | PIRC.MI | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 9.74% | 21.41% |
| 1Y Return | 31.62% | 35.09% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 7.65% | 9.96% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 7.38% | 1.91% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.67 | 1.57 |
| Daily Std Dev | 17.25% | 21.98% |
| Max Drawdown | -80.97% | -60.30% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.11% | -10.07% |
Fundamentals
| ML.PA | PIRC.MI | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | €25.41B | €5.98B |
| EPS | €10.24 | €0.48 |
| PE Ratio | 3.48 | 12.46 |
| Revenue (TTM) | €23.79B | €6.91B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | €6.99B | €6.62B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | €4.43B | €1.27B |
Correlation
The correlation between ML.PA and PIRC.MI is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
ML.PA vs. PIRC.MI - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, ML.PA achieves a 9.74% return, which is significantly lower than PIRC.MI's 21.41% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ML.PA vs. PIRC.MI - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin Société en commandite par actions (ML.PA) and Pirelli & C SPA (PIRC.MI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ML.PA vs. PIRC.MI - Dividend Comparison
ML.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%, less than PIRC.MI's 3.64% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ML.PA Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin Société en commandite par actions | 3.51% | 3.85% | 4.33% | 1.60% | 1.91% | 3.39% | 4.09% | 2.72% | 2.70% | 2.84% | 3.32% | 3.11% |
PIRC.MI Pirelli & C SPA | 3.64% | 4.42% | 4.02% | 1.31% | 4.13% | 3.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ML.PA vs. PIRC.MI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ML.PA drawdown since its inception was -80.97%, which is greater than PIRC.MI's maximum drawdown of -60.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ML.PA and PIRC.MI. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ML.PA vs. PIRC.MI - Volatility Comparison
Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin Société en commandite par actions (ML.PA) and Pirelli & C SPA (PIRC.MI) have volatilities of 4.71% and 4.66%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
ML.PA vs. PIRC.MI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin Société en commandite par actions and Pirelli & C SPA. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities