ML.PA vs. DSY.PA

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ML.PA (Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin Société en commandite par actions) and DSY.PA (Dassault Systèmes SE) are both stocks. ML.PA operates in Auto Parts (Consumer Cyclical), while DSY.PA operates in Software - Application (Technology). Over the past 10 years, ML.PA returned 6.71%/yr vs 3.78%/yr for DSY.PA. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

ML.PA vs. DSY.PA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin Société en commandite par actions (ML.PA) and Dassault Systèmes SE (DSY.PA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ML.PA achieves a 17.03% return, which is significantly higher than DSY.PA's -19.10% return. Over the past 10 years, ML.PA has outperformed DSY.PA with an annualized return of 6.71%, while DSY.PA has yielded a comparatively lower 3.78% annualized return.

ML.PA

• 1D: -0.50%
• 1M: 7.43%
• YTD: 17.03%
• 6M: 17.53%
• 1Y: 0.80%
• 3Y*: 9.24%
• 5Y*: 3.56%
• 10Y*: 6.71%

DSY.PA

• 1D: -2.06%
• 1M: 0.01%
• YTD: -19.10%
• 6M: -17.62%
• 1Y: -40.53%
• 3Y*: -22.30%
• 5Y*: -12.01%
• 10Y*: 3.78%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ML.PA vs. DSY.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ML.PA Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin Société en commandite par actions	17.03%	-7.35%	1.60%	30.63%	-25.10%	39.93%	-1.67%	30.30%	-25.27%	16.32%
DSY.PA Dassault Systèmes SE	-19.10%	-28.28%	-23.82%	32.75%	-35.68%	57.89%	13.92%	42.01%	17.64%	23.17%

Correlation

The correlation between ML.PA and DSY.PA is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.23
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.29
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.34
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 1996	0.34

The correlation between ML.PA and DSY.PA shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (1 year) to 0.34 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

ML.PA vs. DSY.PA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ML.PA

ML.PA Risk / Return Rank: 39
ML.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
ML.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
ML.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 35
ML.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
ML.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 41

DSY.PA

DSY.PA Risk / Return Rank: 7
DSY.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
DSY.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
DSY.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 4
DSY.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
DSY.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ML.PA vs. DSY.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin Société en commandite par actions (ML.PA) and Dassault Systèmes SE (DSY.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ML.PA	DSY.PA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.03	-1.07	+1.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.20	-1.33	+1.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.03	0.78	+0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.04	-0.78	+0.82
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.08	-1.35	+1.43
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ML.PA vs. DSY.PA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ML.PA Sharpe Ratio is 0.03, which is higher than the DSY.PA Sharpe Ratio of -1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ML.PA and DSY.PA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ML.PA	DSY.PA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.03	-1.07	+1.10
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.15	-0.39	+0.54
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.26	0.13	+0.13
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.16	0.28	-0.11

Drawdowns

ML.PA vs. DSY.PA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ML.PA drawdown since its inception was -80.97%, smaller than the maximum DSY.PA drawdown of -86.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ML.PA and DSY.PA.

Drawdown Indicators

	ML.PA	DSY.PA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-80.97%	-86.77%	+5.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.00%	-51.56%	+30.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.18%	-66.60%	+37.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.23%	-70.94%	+30.71%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.81%	-70.94%	+29.13%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.14%	-64.89%	+54.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-27.13%	-34.44%	+7.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.97%	29.06%	-19.09%

Volatility

ML.PA vs. DSY.PA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin Société en commandite par actions (ML.PA) is 5.45%, while Dassault Systèmes SE (DSY.PA) has a volatility of 12.47%. This indicates that ML.PA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DSY.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ML.PA	DSY.PA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.45%	12.47%	-7.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.56%	33.87%	-17.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.78%	37.62%	-14.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.86%	30.28%	-6.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.42%	28.28%	-2.86%

Dividends

ML.PA vs. DSY.PA - Dividend Comparison

ML.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.35%, more than DSY.PA's 1.42% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DSY.PA Dassault Systèmes SE	1.42%	1.09%	0.69%	0.47%	0.51%	0.21%	0.42%	0.44%	0.56%	0.60%	0.65%	0.58%
ML.PA Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin Société en commandite par actions	4.35%	4.87%	4.25%	3.85%	4.33%	1.60%	1.91%	3.39%	4.09%	2.72%	2.70%	2.84%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ML.PA and DSY.PA in my portfolio?

ML.PA and DSY.PA have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.