MKC vs. ES
MKC (McCormick & Company, Incorporated) and ES (Eversource Energy) are both stocks. MKC operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive), while ES operates in Utilities - Regulated Electric (Utilities). Over the past 10 years, MKC returned 1.82%/yr vs 5.44%/yr for ES. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MKC vs. ES - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MKC achieves a -27.49% return, which is significantly lower than ES's 4.32% return. Over the past 10 years, MKC has underperformed ES with an annualized return of 1.82%, while ES has yielded a comparatively higher 5.44% annualized return.
MKC
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- 5.61%
- YTD
- -27.49%
- 6M
- -25.55%
- 1Y
- -31.93%
- 3Y*
- -16.44%
- 5Y*
- -9.29%
- 10Y*
- 1.82%
ES
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 3.48%
- YTD
- 4.32%
- 6M
- 4.28%
- 1Y
- 10.16%
- 3Y*
- 4.00%
- 5Y*
- 0.24%
- 10Y*
- 5.44%
MKC vs. ES - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MKC McCormick & Company, Incorporated | -27.49% | -8.33% | 13.97% | -15.68% | -12.65% | 2.67% | 14.70% | 23.65% | 39.01% | 11.34% |
ES Eversource Energy | 4.32% | 22.86% | -2.46% | -23.43% | -5.06% | 8.18% | 4.45% | 34.49% | 6.41% | 17.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between MKC and ES is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990 | 0.30 |
The correlation between MKC and ES shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (1 year) to 0.43 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MKC:
$13.19B
ES:
$25.87B
MKC:
$6.10
ES:
$4.68
MKC:
8.02
ES:
14.67
MKC:
5.83
ES:
0.83
MKC:
1.85
ES:
1.84
MKC:
1.89
ES:
0.00
MKC:
$7.11B
ES:
$13.93B
MKC:
$2.70B
ES:
$4.19B
MKC:
$1.22B
ES:
$4.60B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MKC vs. ES — Risk / Return Rank
MKC
ES
MKC vs. ES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC) and Eversource Energy (ES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MKC | ES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.80 | 1.09 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.85 | 0.61 | -1.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.69 | 1.46 | -3.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MKC vs. ES - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MKC drawdown since its inception was -52.02%, smaller than the maximum ES drawdown of -73.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MKC and ES.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MKC | ES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.02% | -73.04% | +21.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.50% | -15.13% | -24.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.65% | -28.65% | -19.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.02% | -41.69% | -10.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.02% | -41.69% | -10.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.49% | -13.32% | -35.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.03% | -19.06% | +8.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.92% | 6.30% | +13.62% |
Volatility
MKC vs. ES - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC) is 6.12%, while Eversource Energy (ES) has a volatility of 7.72%. This indicates that MKC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MKC | ES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.12% | 7.72% | -1.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.28% | 16.00% | +7.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.06% | 24.68% | +3.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.34% | 23.94% | +0.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.17% | 24.35% | -0.18% |
Dividends
MKC vs. ES - Dividend Comparison
MKC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.80%, less than ES's 4.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ES Eversource Energy | 4.48% | 4.47% | 4.98% | 4.37% | 3.04% | 2.65% | 2.62% | 2.52% | 3.11% | 3.01% | 3.22% | 3.27% |
MKC McCormick & Company, Incorporated | 3.80% | 2.69% | 2.24% | 2.32% | 1.81% | 1.44% | 1.68% | 1.37% | 1.53% | 1.89% | 1.89% | 1.91% |
Financials
MKC vs. ES - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between McCormick & Company, Incorporated and Eversource Energy. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
MKC and ES have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ES has higher volatility (7.72%) compared to MKC (6.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MKC dropped -52.02% vs ES's -73.04%.
ES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.37 vs -1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MKC and ES
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer