MKC vs. DFND

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

MKC (McCormick & Company, Incorporated) is a stock, while DFND (Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF) is Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender Index. Over the past 10 years, MKC returned 1.82%/yr vs 7.15%/yr for DFND. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

MKC vs. DFND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC) and Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, MKC has underperformed DFND with an annualized return of 1.82%, while DFND has yielded a comparatively higher 7.15% annualized return.

MKC

• 1D: -0.57%
• 1M: 5.61%
• YTD: -27.49%
• 6M: -25.55%
• 1Y: -31.93%
• 3Y*: -16.44%
• 5Y*: -9.29%
• 10Y*: 1.82%

DFND

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• 1Y: 1.72%
• 3Y*: 8.10%
• 5Y*: 4.54%
• 10Y*: 7.15%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MKC vs. DFND - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MKC McCormick & Company, Incorporated	-27.49%	-8.33%	13.97%	-15.68%	-12.65%	2.67%	14.70%	23.65%	39.01%	11.34%
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF	0.00%	10.37%	8.48%	12.13%	-19.59%	14.80%	16.12%	19.53%	-1.83%	16.33%

Correlation

The correlation between MKC and DFND is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.03
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.11
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.16
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2016	0.22

The correlation between MKC and DFND shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (1 year) to 0.23 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MKC vs. DFND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MKC

MKC Risk / Return Rank: 5
MKC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
MKC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
MKC Omega Ratio Rank: 6
MKC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
MKC Martin Ratio Rank: 3

DFND

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MKC vs. DFND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC) and Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MKC	DFND	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.20	0.19	-1.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.70	0.35	-2.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.80	1.05	-0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.85	0.60	-1.45
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.69	1.08	-2.76

MKC vs. DFND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MKC Sharpe Ratio is -1.20, which is lower than the DFND Sharpe Ratio of 0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MKC and DFND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MKC vs. DFND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MKC drawdown since its inception was -52.02%, which is greater than DFND's maximum drawdown of -22.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MKC and DFND.

Drawdown Indicators

	MKC	DFND	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.02%	-22.65%	-29.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-39.50%	-3.44%	-36.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-47.65%	-12.56%	-35.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-52.02%	-22.65%	-29.37%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-52.02%	-22.65%	-29.37%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-48.49%	-3.69%	-44.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.03%	-5.70%	-5.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	19.92%	3.72%	+16.20%

Volatility

MKC vs. DFND - Volatility Comparison

McCormick & Company, Incorporated (MKC) has a higher volatility of 6.12% compared to Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND) at 0.00%. This indicates that MKC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MKC	DFND	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.12%	0.00%	+6.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.28%	6.10%	+17.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.06%	10.88%	+17.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.34%	22.44%	+1.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.17%	19.08%	+5.09%

Dividends

MKC vs. DFND - Dividend Comparison

MKC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.80%, while DFND has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF	0.62%	1.10%	1.64%	1.84%	0.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.77%	0.53%	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%
MKC McCormick & Company, Incorporated	3.80%	2.69%	2.24%	2.32%	1.81%	1.44%	1.68%	1.37%	1.53%	1.89%	1.89%	1.91%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MKC and DFND in my portfolio?

MKC and DFND have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MKC or DFND?

MKC has higher volatility (6.12%) compared to DFND (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MKC dropped -52.02% vs DFND's -22.65%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DFND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.19 vs -1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.