PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MKA.L vs. METC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MKA.L vs. METC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Mkango Resources Ltd (MKA.L) and Ramaco Resources, Inc. (METC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MKA.L is traded in GBp, while METC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the METC values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MKA.L achieves a -7.74% return, which is significantly higher than METC's -14.79% return.


MKA.L

1D
2.14%
1M
-4.67%
YTD
-7.74%
6M
-17.50%
1Y
160.00%
3Y*
57.41%
5Y*
6.89%
10Y*

METC

1D
2.71%
1M
0.44%
YTD
-14.79%
6M
-2.42%
1Y
40.71%
3Y*
27.58%
5Y*
28.13%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MKA.L vs. METC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MKA.L
Mkango Resources Ltd
-7.74%484.91%-30.87%-6.12%-60.48%77.14%103.49%-0.00%18.62%107.14%
METC
Ramaco Resources, Inc.
-14.79%80.55%-36.14%95.64%-25.00%376.69%-21.92%-30.43%-23.79%-56.31%

Correlation

The correlation between MKA.L and METC is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2017

0.04

Fundamentals

EPS

MKA.L:

-$0.04

METC:

-$1.62

PS Ratio

MKA.L:

3.72K

METC:

1.09

Total Revenue (TTM)

MKA.L:

$50.78K

METC:

$523.58M

Gross Profit (TTM)

MKA.L:

-$544.15K

METC:

$10.83M

EBITDA (TTM)

MKA.L:

-$17.87M

METC:

$723.00K

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MKA.L vs. METC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MKA.L
MKA.L Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
MKA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MKA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
MKA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
MKA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
MKA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

METC
METC Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
METC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
METC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
METC Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
METC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
METC Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MKA.L vs. METC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mkango Resources Ltd (MKA.L) and Ramaco Resources, Inc. (METC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MKA.LMETCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.17

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.09

0.68

+2.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.25

0.94

+5.31

MKA.L vs. METC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MKA.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.67, which is higher than the METC Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MKA.L and METC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MKA.L vs. METC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MKA.L drawdown since its inception was -88.80%, roughly equal to the maximum METC drawdown of -86.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MKA.L and METC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MKA.LMETCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.80%

-86.25%

-2.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-51.45%

-76.19%

+24.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-67.06%

-76.19%

+9.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-88.80%

-76.19%

-12.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-88.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.83%

-72.21%

+34.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.09%

-52.38%

+9.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.50%

54.76%

-29.26%

Volatility

MKA.L vs. METC - Volatility Comparison

Mkango Resources Ltd (MKA.L) has a higher volatility of 22.52% compared to Ramaco Resources, Inc. (METC) at 21.42%. This indicates that MKA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than METC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MKA.LMETCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.52%

21.42%

+1.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

48.28%

60.69%

-12.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

94.98%

101.72%

-6.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

77.51%

81.35%

-3.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

96.26%

75.49%

+20.77%

Dividends

MKA.L vs. METC - Dividend Comparison

Neither MKA.L nor METC has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
METC
Ramaco Resources, Inc.
0.00%1.10%5.32%2.91%5.11%
MKA.L
Mkango Resources Ltd
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

MKA.L vs. METC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mkango Resources Ltd and Ramaco Resources, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M20222023202420252026
50.78K
121.61M
(MKA.L) Total Revenue
(METC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


MKA.L and METC have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MKA.L and METC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer