MKA.L vs. HYMC

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Mkango Resources Ltd (MKA.L) and Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC).

Performance

MKA.L vs. HYMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Mkango Resources Ltd (MKA.L) and Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MKA.L vs. HYMC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
MKA.L Mkango Resources Ltd	-24.73%	484.91%	-30.87%	-6.12%	-60.48%	77.14%	103.49%	-0.00%	10.97%
HYMC Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation	49.89%	898.94%	-8.22%	-56.26%	-2.99%	-92.11%	-26.26%	0.15%	12.82%

Different Trading Currencies

MKA.L is traded in GBp, while HYMC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the HYMC values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Fundamentals

Market Cap MKA.L : £114.55M HYMC : $1.52B
EPS MKA.L : -£0.05 HYMC : -$1.24
Total Revenue (TTM) MKA.L : £0.00 HYMC : $0.00
Gross Profit (TTM) MKA.L : £0.00 HYMC : $0.00
EBITDA (TTM) MKA.L : -£13.86M HYMC : -$27.62M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MKA.L achieves a -24.73% return, which is significantly lower than HYMC's 49.89% return.

MKA.L

• 1D: -9.33%
• 1M: -36.59%
• YTD: -24.73%
• 6M: -30.69%
• 1Y: 151.80%
• 3Y*: 45.45%
• 5Y*: 13.00%
• 10Y*: —

HYMC

• 1D: -0.66%
• 1M: -36.41%
• YTD: 49.89%
• 6M: 444.14%
• 1Y: 1,039.01%
• 3Y*: 96.12%
• 5Y*: -1.53%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

MKA.L vs. HYMC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MKA.L

MKA.L Risk / Return Rank: 84
MKA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
MKA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
MKA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 79
MKA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
MKA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 82

HYMC

HYMC Risk / Return Rank: 99
HYMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
HYMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
HYMC Omega Ratio Rank: 97
HYMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
HYMC Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MKA.L vs. HYMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mkango Resources Ltd (MKA.L) and Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MKA.L	HYMC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.57	8.97	-7.40
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.59	4.89	-2.30
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.61	-0.32
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.04	20.78	-17.73
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.95	55.15	-48.20
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MKA.L vs. HYMC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MKA.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is lower than the HYMC Sharpe Ratio of 8.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MKA.L and HYMC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MKA.L	HYMC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.57	8.97	-7.40
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.16	-0.01	+0.17
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.26	-0.09	+0.35

Correlation

The correlation between MKA.L and HYMC is 0.04, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

MKA.L vs. HYMC - Dividend Comparison

Neither MKA.L nor HYMC has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

MKA.L vs. HYMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MKA.L drawdown since its inception was -88.80%, smaller than the maximum HYMC drawdown of -98.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MKA.L and HYMC.

Drawdown Indicators

	MKA.L	HYMC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-88.80%	-98.89%	+10.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-49.28%	-46.18%	-3.10%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-88.80%	-95.83%	+7.03%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-49.28%	-77.84%	+28.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-43.27%	-63.04%	+19.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	21.59%	17.60%	+3.99%

Volatility

MKA.L vs. HYMC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Mkango Resources Ltd (MKA.L) is 12.24%, while Hycroft Mining Holding Corporation (HYMC) has a volatility of 35.69%. This indicates that MKA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MKA.L	HYMC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.24%	35.69%	-23.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	60.25%	95.47%	-35.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	97.15%	117.37%	-20.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	79.35%	151.90%	-72.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	96.43%	123.39%	-26.96%

Financials