MJUS vs. DFAU

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about ETFMG U.S. Alternative Harvest ETF (MJUS) and Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU).

MJUS and DFAU are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MJUS is an actively managed fund by ETFMG. It was launched on May 12, 2021. DFAU is an actively managed fund by Dimensional. It was launched on Nov 17, 2020.

Performance

MJUS vs. DFAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETFMG U.S. Alternative Harvest ETF (MJUS) and Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MJUS vs. DFAU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
MJUS ETFMG U.S. Alternative Harvest ETF	0.00%	0.00%	27.88%	-17.41%	-66.89%	-39.41%
DFAU Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF	-2.67%	16.78%	23.17%	24.79%	-16.99%	14.54%

Returns By Period

MJUS

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DFAU

• 1D: 0.71%
• 1M: -4.35%
• YTD: -2.67%
• 6M: -0.51%
• 1Y: 19.02%
• 3Y*: 17.82%
• 5Y*: 11.15%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MJUS vs. DFAU - Expense Ratio Comparison

MJUS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than DFAU's 0.12% expense ratio.

MJUS

ETFMG U.S. Alternative Harvest ETF

DFAU

Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF

Return for Risk

MJUS vs. DFAU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFAU

DFAU Risk / Return Rank: 61
DFAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
DFAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
DFAU Omega Ratio Rank: 62
DFAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
DFAU Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MJUS vs. DFAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETFMG U.S. Alternative Harvest ETF (MJUS) and Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MJUS	DFAU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.03	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.66	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.80	—

Correlation

The correlation between MJUS and DFAU is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

MJUS vs. DFAU - Dividend Comparison

MJUS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DFAU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
MJUS ETFMG U.S. Alternative Harvest ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
DFAU Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF	1.03%	0.95%	1.10%	1.29%	1.40%	1.00%	0.13%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	MJUS	DFAU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-23.61%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-12.45%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-23.61%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-5.36%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-5.12%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.62%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MJUS	DFAU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.39%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.67%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	18.52%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	17.03%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	16.87%	—