PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MJUS vs. MSOS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MJUS vs. MSOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETFMG U.S. Alternative Harvest ETF (MJUS) and AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF (MSOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


MJUS

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MSOS

1D
-6.14%
1M
-2.07%
YTD
0.42%
6M
28.46%
1Y
99.16%
3Y*
-4.01%
5Y*
-35.03%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MJUS vs. MSOS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
MJUS
ETFMG U.S. Alternative Harvest ETF
0.00%0.00%27.88%-17.41%-66.89%-39.41%
MSOS
AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF
0.42%23.88%-45.65%0.29%-72.68%-34.73%

Correlation

The correlation between MJUS and MSOS is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2021

0.54

The correlation between MJUS and MSOS shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (3 years) to 0.54 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MJUS vs. MSOS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MJUS
MSOS

Healthcare

14.1%
2.5%

Financial Services

4.7%

-

Technology

3.6%

-

Real Estate

1.6%
50.2%

Consumer Cyclical

0.8%
17.8%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Industrials

-

29.6%

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

MJUS
14.1%
MSOS
2.5%

Financial Services

MJUS
4.7%
MSOS

-

Technology

MJUS
3.6%
MSOS

-

Real Estate

MJUS
1.6%
MSOS
50.2%

Consumer Cyclical

MJUS
0.8%
MSOS
17.8%

Basic Materials

MJUS

-

MSOS

-

Communication Services

MJUS

-

MSOS

-

Consumer Defensive

MJUS

-

MSOS

-

Energy

MJUS

-

MSOS

-

Industrials

MJUS

-

MSOS
29.6%

Utilities

MJUS

-

MSOS

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MJUS vs. MSOS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MJUS

MSOS
MSOS Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
MSOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSOS Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
MSOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSOS Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MJUS vs. MSOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETFMG U.S. Alternative Harvest ETF (MJUS) and AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF (MSOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MJUS vs. MSOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MJUSMSOSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.34

Drawdowns

MJUS vs. MSOS - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MJUSMSOSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-52.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-81.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-94.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-91.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-71.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.78%

Volatility

MJUS vs. MSOS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MJUSMSOSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

80.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

112.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

77.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

74.04%

MJUS vs. MSOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

MJUS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than MSOS's 0.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

MJUS vs. MSOS - Dividend Comparison

Neither MJUS nor MSOS has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
MJUS
ETFMG U.S. Alternative Harvest ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MSOS
AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


MJUS and MSOS have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MSOS is cheaper at 0.74% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MSOS is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for MJUS.

MJUS and MSOS have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

MJUS is categorized as Cannabis, while MSOS is Small Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: ETFMG and AdvisorShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for MJUS and 0.74% for MSOS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MJUS and MSOS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer