PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MJUS vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MJUS vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETFMG U.S. Alternative Harvest ETF (MJUS) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-47.00%
11.19%
MJUS
^GSPC

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MJUS achieves a -33.77% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 24.05% return.


MJUS

YTD

-33.77%

1M

-31.79%

6M

-46.98%

1Y

-32.56%

5Y (annualized)

N/A

10Y (annualized)

N/A

^GSPC

YTD

24.05%

1M

0.89%

6M

11.19%

1Y

30.12%

5Y (annualized)

13.82%

10Y (annualized)

11.14%

Key characteristics


MJUS^GSPC
Sharpe Ratio-0.472.54
Sortino Ratio-0.283.40
Omega Ratio0.961.47
Calmar Ratio-0.393.66
Martin Ratio-1.2816.28
Ulcer Index27.35%1.91%
Daily Std Dev74.60%12.25%
Max Drawdown-90.90%-56.78%
Current Drawdown-89.67%-1.41%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between MJUS and ^GSPC is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MJUS vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETFMG U.S. Alternative Harvest ETF (MJUS) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MJUS, currently valued at -0.47, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.472.54
The chart of Sortino ratio for MJUS, currently valued at -0.28, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00-0.283.40
The chart of Omega ratio for MJUS, currently valued at 0.96, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.000.961.47
The chart of Calmar ratio for MJUS, currently valued at -0.39, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.00-0.393.66
The chart of Martin ratio for MJUS, currently valued at -1.28, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.00-1.2816.28
MJUS
^GSPC

The current MJUS Sharpe Ratio is -0.47, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MJUS and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.47
2.54
MJUS
^GSPC

Drawdowns

MJUS vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MJUS drawdown since its inception was -90.90%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MJUS and ^GSPC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-100.00%-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-89.67%
-1.41%
MJUS
^GSPC

Volatility

MJUS vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

ETFMG U.S. Alternative Harvest ETF (MJUS) has a higher volatility of 41.48% compared to S&P 500 (^GSPC) at 4.07%. This indicates that MJUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
41.48%
4.07%
MJUS
^GSPC