PortfoliosLab logo
MJUS vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between MJUS and ^GSPC is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

MJUS vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETFMG U.S. Alternative Harvest ETF (MJUS) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-100.00%-50.00%0.00%50.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-91.92%
37.40%
MJUS
^GSPC

Key characteristics

Returns By Period


MJUS

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

^GSPC

YTD

-3.93%

1M

11.36%

6M

-1.09%

1Y

10.19%

5Y*

14.74%

10Y*

10.35%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

MJUS vs. ^GSPC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MJUS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MJUS is 11
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MJUS is 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MJUS is 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MJUS is 00
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MJUS is 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MJUS is 00
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ^GSPC is 7171
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MJUS vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETFMG U.S. Alternative Harvest ETF (MJUS) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-1.10
0.65
MJUS
^GSPC

Drawdowns

MJUS vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison


-100.00%-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-92.38%
-8.04%
MJUS
^GSPC

Volatility

MJUS vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ETFMG U.S. Alternative Harvest ETF (MJUS) is 0.00%, while S&P 500 (^GSPC) has a volatility of 13.20%. This indicates that MJUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay0
13.20%
MJUS
^GSPC