PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MJFOX vs. MASGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MJFOX vs. MASGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews Japan Fund (MJFOX) and Matthews Asia ESG Fund (MASGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MJFOX achieves a 16.96% return, which is significantly lower than MASGX's 47.58% return. Over the past 10 years, MJFOX has underperformed MASGX with an annualized return of 9.08%, while MASGX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.96% annualized return.


MJFOX

1D
-0.28%
1M
5.70%
YTD
16.96%
6M
18.02%
1Y
28.75%
3Y*
23.06%
5Y*
8.52%
10Y*
9.08%

MASGX

1D
2.20%
1M
9.83%
YTD
47.58%
6M
49.46%
1Y
72.60%
3Y*
21.72%
5Y*
9.27%
10Y*
12.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MJFOX vs. MASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MJFOX
Matthews Japan Fund
16.96%22.72%16.31%25.79%-27.84%-5.79%29.80%26.08%-20.12%33.22%
MASGX
Matthews Asia ESG Fund
47.58%22.83%-2.51%7.99%-14.37%5.33%42.90%12.56%-9.70%33.75%

Correlation

The correlation between MJFOX and MASGX is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.58

The correlation between MJFOX and MASGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MJFOX vs. MASGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MJFOX
MJFOX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
MJFOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MJFOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
MJFOX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
MJFOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
MJFOX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

MASGX
MASGX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
MASGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MASGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
MASGX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
MASGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
MASGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MJFOX vs. MASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Japan Fund (MJFOX) and Matthews Asia ESG Fund (MASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MJFOXMASGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.61

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

5.34

-3.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.82

19.58

-12.76

MJFOX vs. MASGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MJFOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is lower than the MASGX Sharpe Ratio of 3.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MJFOX and MASGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MJFOXMASGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.27

3.46

-2.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.45

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.70

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.68

-0.31

Drawdowns

MJFOX vs. MASGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MJFOX drawdown since its inception was -63.52%, which is greater than MASGX's maximum drawdown of -36.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MJFOX and MASGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MJFOXMASGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.52%

-36.34%

-27.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.53%

-14.20%

-0.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.14%

-24.94%

+7.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.85%

-36.34%

-6.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.85%

-36.34%

-6.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.49%

0.00%

-0.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.26%

-11.23%

-10.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.04%

3.81%

+0.23%

Volatility

MJFOX vs. MASGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Matthews Japan Fund (MJFOX) is 4.91%, while Matthews Asia ESG Fund (MASGX) has a volatility of 9.70%. This indicates that MJFOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MASGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MJFOXMASGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.91%

9.70%

-4.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.20%

18.92%

-1.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.89%

21.97%

-0.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.41%

20.86%

-0.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.85%

18.68%

+0.17%

MJFOX vs. MASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MJFOX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than MASGX's 1.24% expense ratio.


Dividends

MJFOX vs. MASGX - Dividend Comparison

MJFOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, less than MASGX's 3.78% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
MASGX
Matthews Asia ESG Fund
3.78%5.58%2.58%7.52%5.39%2.60%5.66%1.36%4.52%3.70%1.47%
MJFOX
Matthews Japan Fund
1.67%1.96%2.12%6.09%7.19%8.08%10.15%8.63%4.14%3.90%1.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


MJFOX and MASGX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MASGX has higher volatility (9.70%) compared to MJFOX (4.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MJFOX dropped -63.52% vs MASGX's -36.34%.

MASGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.46 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MJFOX and MASGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer