PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MASGX vs. DFRSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MASGX vs. DFRSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews Asia ESG Fund (MASGX) and DFA Asia Pacific Small Company (DFRSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MASGX achieves a 31.19% return, which is significantly higher than DFRSX's 1.77% return. Over the past 10 years, MASGX has outperformed DFRSX with an annualized return of 11.03%, while DFRSX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.87% annualized return.


MASGX

1D
1.85%
1M
-7.72%
6M
18.29%
YTD
31.19%
1Y
49.61%
3Y*
13.59%
5Y*
6.07%
10Y*
11.03%
ALL TIME*
10.99%

DFRSX

1D
-0.23%
1M
1.63%
6M
-4.63%
YTD
1.77%
1Y
18.49%
3Y*
12.02%
5Y*
3.94%
10Y*
5.87%
ALL TIME*
6.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MASGX vs. DFRSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MASGX
Matthews Asia ESG Fund
31.19%22.83%-2.51%7.99%-14.37%5.33%42.90%12.56%-9.70%33.75%
DFRSX
DFA Asia Pacific Small Company
1.77%34.73%0.27%3.99%-16.96%12.59%14.24%13.30%-15.48%25.17%

Correlation

The correlation between MASGX and DFRSX is 0.63, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.65

The correlation between MASGX and DFRSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MASGX vs. DFRSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MASGX
MASGX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
MASGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MASGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
MASGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
MASGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
MASGX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

DFRSX
DFRSX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
DFRSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFRSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFRSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
DFRSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFRSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MASGX vs. DFRSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Asia ESG Fund (MASGX) and DFA Asia Pacific Small Company (DFRSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MASGXDFRSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.21

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.47

1.32

+1.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.90

3.23

+5.67

MASGX vs. DFRSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MASGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is higher than the DFRSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MASGX and DFRSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MASGX vs. DFRSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MASGX drawdown since its inception was -36.34%, smaller than the maximum DFRSX drawdown of -69.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MASGX and DFRSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MASGXDFRSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.34%

-69.06%

+32.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.80%

-14.20%

-5.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.94%

-21.29%

-3.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.34%

-30.18%

-6.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.34%

-46.25%

+9.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.93%

-8.46%

-6.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.18%

-17.17%

+5.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.49%

5.79%

-0.30%

Volatility

MASGX vs. DFRSX - Volatility Comparison

Matthews Asia ESG Fund (MASGX) has a higher volatility of 10.98% compared to DFA Asia Pacific Small Company (DFRSX) at 4.40%. This indicates that MASGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFRSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MASGXDFRSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.98%

4.40%

+6.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.32%

13.70%

+11.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.62%

16.40%

+11.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.04%

17.41%

+4.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.43%

17.05%

+2.38%

MASGX vs. DFRSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MASGX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than DFRSX's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

MASGX vs. DFRSX - Dividend Comparison

MASGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.26%, less than DFRSX's 4.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFRSX
DFA Asia Pacific Small Company
4.83%4.92%4.66%4.70%9.99%12.82%2.91%4.56%3.48%4.01%3.79%3.96%
MASGX
Matthews Asia ESG Fund
4.26%5.58%2.58%7.52%5.39%2.60%5.66%1.36%4.52%3.70%1.47%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MASGX and DFRSX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MASGX has higher volatility (10.98%) compared to DFRSX (4.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MASGX dropped -36.34% vs DFRSX's -69.06%.

MASGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MASGX and DFRSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer