MASGX vs. MSMLX
Compare and contrast key facts about Matthews Asia ESG Fund (MASGX) and Matthews Emerging Markets Small Companies Fund (MSMLX).
MASGX is managed by Matthews. It was launched on Apr 29, 2015. MSMLX is managed by Matthews. It was launched on Sep 14, 2008.
Performance
MASGX vs. MSMLX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MASGX vs. MSMLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MASGX Matthews Asia ESG Fund | 4.69% | 22.83% | -2.51% | 7.99% | -14.37% | 5.33% | 42.90% | 12.56% | -9.70% | 33.75% |
MSMLX Matthews Emerging Markets Small Companies Fund | -0.43% | 13.50% | -6.10% | 20.04% | -16.78% | 26.40% | 43.69% | 17.38% | -17.80% | 30.43% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MASGX achieves a 4.69% return, which is significantly higher than MSMLX's -0.43% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MASGX having a 9.21% annualized return and MSMLX not far ahead at 9.25%.
MASGX
- 1D
- -1.83%
- 1M
- -13.33%
- YTD
- 4.69%
- 6M
- 8.81%
- 1Y
- 29.25%
- 3Y*
- 10.16%
- 5Y*
- 3.06%
- 10Y*
- 9.21%
MSMLX
- 1D
- -1.87%
- 1M
- -12.08%
- YTD
- -0.43%
- 6M
- -1.97%
- 1Y
- 15.42%
- 3Y*
- 6.49%
- 5Y*
- 5.95%
- 10Y*
- 9.25%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MASGX vs. MSMLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MASGX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is lower than MSMLX's 1.37% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MASGX vs. MSMLX — Risk / Return Rank
MASGX
MSMLX
MASGX vs. MSMLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Asia ESG Fund (MASGX) and Matthews Emerging Markets Small Companies Fund (MSMLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MASGX | MSMLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.45 | 0.83 | +0.61 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.94 | 1.20 | +0.74 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.16 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.44 | 0.87 | +0.57 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.06 | 2.85 | +2.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MASGX | MSMLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.45 | 0.83 | +0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | 0.35 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 0.55 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.58 | -0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between MASGX and MSMLX is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MASGX vs. MSMLX - Dividend Comparison
MASGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.33%, more than MSMLX's 1.50% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MASGX Matthews Asia ESG Fund | 5.33% | 5.58% | 2.58% | 7.52% | 5.39% | 2.60% | 5.66% | 1.36% | 4.52% | 3.70% | 1.47% | 0.00% |
MSMLX Matthews Emerging Markets Small Companies Fund | 1.50% | 1.50% | 3.95% | 8.36% | 8.04% | 9.18% | 0.28% | 0.51% | 21.31% | 8.12% | 0.43% | 0.13% |
Drawdowns
MASGX vs. MSMLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MASGX drawdown since its inception was -36.34%, roughly equal to the maximum MSMLX drawdown of -36.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MASGX and MSMLX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MASGX | MSMLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.34% | -36.40% | +0.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.20% | -12.89% | -1.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.34% | -28.00% | -8.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.34% | -34.33% | -2.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.20% | -12.89% | -1.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.38% | -9.30% | -2.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.36% | 3.93% | +0.43% |
Volatility
MASGX vs. MSMLX - Volatility Comparison
Matthews Asia ESG Fund (MASGX) has a higher volatility of 9.85% compared to Matthews Emerging Markets Small Companies Fund (MSMLX) at 8.16%. This indicates that MASGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSMLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MASGX | MSMLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.85% | 8.16% | +1.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.17% | 12.87% | +2.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.08% | 17.61% | +2.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.13% | 17.24% | +2.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.20% | 16.83% | +1.37% |