MJFOX vs. MCSMX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

MJFOX (Matthews Japan Fund) and MCSMX (Matthews China Small Companies Fund) are both mutual funds - MJFOX is a Japan Equities fund managed by Matthews, while MCSMX is a China Equities fund managed by Matthews. Over the past 10 years, MJFOX returned 8.77%/yr vs 11.64%/yr for MCSMX. Their 0.44 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. MJFOX charges 1.05%/yr vs 1.41%/yr for MCSMX.

Performance

MJFOX vs. MCSMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews Japan Fund (MJFOX) and Matthews China Small Companies Fund (MCSMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MJFOX achieves a 16.42% return, which is significantly lower than MCSMX's 20.37% return. Over the past 10 years, MJFOX has underperformed MCSMX with an annualized return of 8.77%, while MCSMX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.64% annualized return.

MJFOX

• 1D: 4.86%
• 1M: 0.25%
• 6M: 11.30%
• YTD: 16.42%
• 1Y: 30.02%
• 3Y*: 21.72%
• 5Y*: 8.79%
• 10Y*: 8.77%
• ALL TIME*: 7.32%

MCSMX

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: -17.35%
• 6M: 8.68%
• YTD: 20.37%
• 1Y: 33.61%
• 3Y*: 10.82%
• 5Y*: -1.67%
• 10Y*: 11.64%
• ALL TIME*: 7.53%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
MCSMX Matthews China Small Companies Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
MJFOX Matthews Japan Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

MJFOX vs. MCSMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MJFOX Matthews Japan Fund	16.42%	22.72%	16.31%	25.79%	-27.84%	-5.79%	29.80%	26.08%	-20.12%	33.22%
MCSMX Matthews China Small Companies Fund	20.37%	28.85%	2.82%	-17.50%	-31.25%	6.71%	82.73%	35.41%	-17.65%	53.71%

Correlation

The correlation between MJFOX and MCSMX is 0.44, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.44
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.39
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.41
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2011	0.44

Return for Risk

MJFOX vs. MCSMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MJFOX

MJFOX Risk / Return Rank: 51
MJFOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
MJFOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
MJFOX Omega Ratio Rank: 47
MJFOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
MJFOX Martin Ratio Rank: 51

MCSMX

MCSMX Risk / Return Rank: 34
MCSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
MCSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
MCSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 37
MCSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
MCSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MJFOX vs. MCSMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Japan Fund (MJFOX) and Matthews China Small Companies Fund (MCSMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MJFOX	MCSMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.29	1.09	+0.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.92	1.59	+0.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.21	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.11	1.29	+0.82
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.09	4.79	+2.30

MJFOX vs. MCSMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MJFOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is comparable to the MCSMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MJFOX and MCSMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MJFOX vs. MCSMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MJFOX drawdown since its inception was -63.52%, which is greater than MCSMX's maximum drawdown of -55.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MJFOX and MCSMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MJFOX	MCSMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.52%	-55.77%	-7.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.53%	-24.88%	+10.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.14%	-24.88%	+7.74%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-42.85%	-51.10%	+8.25%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.85%	-55.77%	+12.92%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.62%	-24.88%	+20.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.15%	-20.10%	-1.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.28%	6.59%	-2.31%

Volatility

MJFOX vs. MCSMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Matthews Japan Fund (MJFOX) is 8.47%, while Matthews China Small Companies Fund (MCSMX) has a volatility of 14.27%. This indicates that MJFOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MCSMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MJFOX	MCSMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.47%	14.27%	-5.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.00%	26.46%	-6.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.80%	29.46%	-5.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.97%	25.54%	-4.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.10%	23.15%	-4.05%

MJFOX vs. MCSMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MJFOX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than MCSMX's 1.41% expense ratio.

Dividends

MJFOX vs. MCSMX - Dividend Comparison

MJFOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, less than MCSMX's 1.85% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MCSMX Matthews China Small Companies Fund	1.85%	2.23%	1.35%	2.36%	1.78%	26.38%	16.98%	1.03%	2.25%	5.66%	4.79%	8.88%
MJFOX Matthews Japan Fund	1.68%	1.96%	2.12%	6.09%	7.19%	8.08%	10.15%	8.63%	4.14%	3.90%	1.15%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MJFOX and MCSMX in my portfolio?

MJFOX and MCSMX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MJFOX or MCSMX?

MCSMX has higher volatility (14.27%) compared to MJFOX (8.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MJFOX dropped -63.52% vs MCSMX's -55.77%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MJFOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.