PortfoliosLab logo
MJFOX vs. CNKY.L
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between MJFOX and CNKY.L is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

MJFOX vs. CNKY.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews Japan Fund (MJFOX) and iShares Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (Acc) (CNKY.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MJFOX:

0.68

CNKY.L:

0.10

Sortino Ratio

MJFOX:

0.99

CNKY.L:

0.26

Omega Ratio

MJFOX:

1.13

CNKY.L:

1.03

Calmar Ratio

MJFOX:

0.77

CNKY.L:

0.09

Martin Ratio

MJFOX:

2.50

CNKY.L:

0.33

Ulcer Index

MJFOX:

5.69%

CNKY.L:

5.23%

Daily Std Dev

MJFOX:

22.49%

CNKY.L:

18.97%

Max Drawdown

MJFOX:

-67.76%

CNKY.L:

-23.61%

Current Drawdown

MJFOX:

-1.57%

CNKY.L:

-6.96%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MJFOX achieves a 7.64% return, which is significantly higher than CNKY.L's -1.71% return. Over the past 10 years, MJFOX has underperformed CNKY.L with an annualized return of 6.31%, while CNKY.L has yielded a comparatively higher 7.72% annualized return.


MJFOX

YTD

7.64%

1M

12.12%

6M

7.00%

1Y

15.11%

5Y*

8.28%

10Y*

6.31%

CNKY.L

YTD

-1.71%

1M

10.98%

6M

-0.89%

1Y

1.82%

5Y*

6.45%

10Y*

7.72%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MJFOX vs. CNKY.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MJFOX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than CNKY.L's 0.48% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

MJFOX vs. CNKY.L — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MJFOX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MJFOX is 6565
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MJFOX is 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MJFOX is 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MJFOX is 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MJFOX is 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MJFOX is 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

CNKY.L
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CNKY.L is 1919
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CNKY.L is 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CNKY.L is 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CNKY.L is 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CNKY.L is 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CNKY.L is 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MJFOX vs. CNKY.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Japan Fund (MJFOX) and iShares Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (Acc) (CNKY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current MJFOX Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is higher than the CNKY.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MJFOX and CNKY.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

MJFOX vs. CNKY.L - Dividend Comparison

MJFOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%, while CNKY.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MJFOX
Matthews Japan Fund
1.97%2.12%0.00%0.00%1.07%0.52%0.56%0.32%0.81%0.88%0.00%0.51%
CNKY.L
iShares Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

MJFOX vs. CNKY.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MJFOX drawdown since its inception was -67.76%, which is greater than CNKY.L's maximum drawdown of -23.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MJFOX and CNKY.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

MJFOX vs. CNKY.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Matthews Japan Fund (MJFOX) is 3.70%, while iShares Nikkei 225 UCITS ETF (Acc) (CNKY.L) has a volatility of 5.11%. This indicates that MJFOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNKY.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...