PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MASGX vs. PAAOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MASGX vs. PAAOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Matthews Asia ESG Fund (MASGX) and T. Rowe Price Asia Opportunities Fund (PAAOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MASGX achieves a 28.81% return, which is significantly higher than PAAOX's 7.13% return. Over the past 10 years, MASGX has outperformed PAAOX with an annualized return of 10.77%, while PAAOX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.35% annualized return.


MASGX

1D
4.14%
1M
-9.40%
6M
15.47%
YTD
28.81%
1Y
46.89%
3Y*
12.31%
5Y*
5.68%
10Y*
10.77%
ALL TIME*
10.80%

PAAOX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
6M
1.02%
YTD
7.13%
1Y
23.47%
3Y*
12.45%
5Y*
3.05%
10Y*
8.35%
ALL TIME*
7.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

MASGX vs. PAAOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MASGX
Matthews Asia ESG Fund
28.81%22.83%-2.51%7.99%-14.37%5.33%42.90%12.56%-9.70%33.75%
PAAOX
T. Rowe Price Asia Opportunities Fund
7.13%27.78%11.30%-1.00%-19.33%-5.50%26.57%24.86%-11.26%43.07%

Correlation

The correlation between MASGX and PAAOX is 0.59, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.79

Over the past year, the correlation between MASGX and PAAOX has dropped to 0.59 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MASGX vs. PAAOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MASGX
MASGX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
MASGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MASGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
MASGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
MASGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
MASGX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

PAAOX
PAAOX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
PAAOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAAOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAAOX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
PAAOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAAOX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MASGX vs. PAAOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Matthews Asia ESG Fund (MASGX) and T. Rowe Price Asia Opportunities Fund (PAAOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MASGXPAAOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.30

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.26

1.53

+0.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.27

4.58

+3.69

MASGX vs. PAAOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MASGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the PAAOX Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MASGX and PAAOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MASGX vs. PAAOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MASGX drawdown since its inception was -36.34%, smaller than the maximum PAAOX drawdown of -43.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MASGX and PAAOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MASGXPAAOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.34%

-43.02%

+6.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.80%

-13.70%

-6.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.94%

-18.78%

-6.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.34%

-38.08%

+1.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.34%

-43.02%

+6.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.48%

-5.51%

-10.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.18%

-13.03%

+1.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.41%

4.57%

+0.84%

Volatility

MASGX vs. PAAOX - Volatility Comparison

Matthews Asia ESG Fund (MASGX) has a higher volatility of 10.78% compared to T. Rowe Price Asia Opportunities Fund (PAAOX) at 0.00%. This indicates that MASGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAAOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MASGXPAAOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.78%

0.00%

+10.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.26%

12.66%

+12.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.59%

16.49%

+11.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.03%

17.93%

+4.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.42%

17.56%

+1.86%

MASGX vs. PAAOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MASGX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is lower than PAAOX's 1.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

MASGX vs. PAAOX - Dividend Comparison

MASGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.33%, more than PAAOX's 3.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MASGX
Matthews Asia ESG Fund
4.33%5.58%2.58%7.52%5.39%2.60%5.66%1.36%4.52%3.70%1.47%0.00%
PAAOX
T. Rowe Price Asia Opportunities Fund
3.21%0.64%0.00%1.55%1.51%7.43%1.33%0.62%0.61%0.13%2.12%0.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


MASGX and PAAOX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MASGX has higher volatility (10.78%) compared to PAAOX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MASGX dropped -36.34% vs PAAOX's -43.02%.

MASGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MASGX and PAAOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer