MJ vs. TLRY
MJ (ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF) is Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Prime Alternative Harvest Index, while TLRY (Tilray, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, MJ returned -35.31%/yr vs -51.38%/yr for TLRY. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
MJ vs. TLRY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MJ achieves a -14.07% return, which is significantly higher than TLRY's -43.41% return.
MJ
- 1D
- -3.25%
- 1M
- -5.09%
- YTD
- -14.07%
- 6M
- 1.76%
- 1Y
- 40.95%
- 3Y*
- -7.86%
- 5Y*
- -35.31%
- 10Y*
- —
TLRY
- 1D
- -5.02%
- 1M
- -13.39%
- YTD
- -43.41%
- 6M
- -27.62%
- 1Y
- 27.62%
- 3Y*
- -33.27%
- 5Y*
- -51.38%
- 10Y*
- —
MJ vs. TLRY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MJ ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF | -14.07% | 13.07% | -23.97% | -24.18% | -61.55% | -22.79% | -16.18% | -31.36% | -9.11% |
TLRY Tilray, Inc. | -43.41% | -32.11% | -42.17% | -14.50% | -61.74% | -14.89% | -51.78% | -75.72% | 215.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between MJ and TLRY is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2018 | 0.78 |
The correlation between MJ and TLRY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MJ vs. TLRY — Risk / Return Rank
MJ
TLRY
MJ vs. TLRY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF (MJ) and Tilray, Inc. (TLRY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MJ | TLRY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.47 | 0.21 | +0.26 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.51 | 1.58 | -0.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.17 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.85 | 0.37 | +0.48 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.52 | 0.57 | +0.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MJ | TLRY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 | 0.21 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.59 | -0.54 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.48 | -0.34 | -0.14 |
Drawdowns
MJ vs. TLRY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MJ drawdown since its inception was -96.55%, roughly equal to the maximum TLRY drawdown of -99.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MJ and TLRY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MJ | TLRY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.55% | -99.83% | +3.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.66% | -75.67% | +27.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -69.73% | -89.12% | +19.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -93.27% | -98.32% | +5.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -94.45% | -99.76% | +5.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.20% | -91.40% | +22.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.08% | 49.01% | -21.93% |
Volatility
MJ vs. TLRY - Volatility Comparison
ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF (MJ) has a higher volatility of 11.92% compared to Tilray, Inc. (TLRY) at 10.87%. This indicates that MJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TLRY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MJ | TLRY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.92% | 10.87% | +1.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 59.46% | 64.10% | -4.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 86.70% | 131.31% | -44.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.89% | 94.98% | -35.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.74% | 112.04% | -56.30% |
Dividends
MJ vs. TLRY - Dividend Comparison
MJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, while TLRY has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
MJ ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF | 2.31% | 1.98% | 13.80% |
TLRY Tilray, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MJ and TLRY have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MJ has higher volatility (11.92%) compared to TLRY (10.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MJ dropped -96.55% vs TLRY's -99.83%.
MJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.47 vs 0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MJ and TLRY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer