PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TLRY vs. CGC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TLRY vs. CGC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tilray, Inc. (TLRY) and Canopy Growth Corporation (CGC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLRY achieves a -48.95% return, which is significantly lower than CGC's -17.00% return.


TLRY

1D
0.44%
1M
-12.85%
YTD
-48.95%
6M
-56.22%
1Y
27.88%
3Y*
-32.81%
5Y*
-52.09%
10Y*

CGC

1D
-1.14%
1M
-9.02%
YTD
-17.00%
6M
-32.41%
1Y
-20.49%
3Y*
-43.24%
5Y*
-67.15%
10Y*
-26.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TLRY vs. CGC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
TLRY
Tilray, Inc.
-48.95%-32.11%-42.17%-14.50%-61.74%-14.89%-51.78%-75.72%206.03%
CGC
Canopy Growth Corporation
-17.00%-58.39%-46.38%-77.88%-73.54%-64.57%16.83%-21.51%0.98%

Correlation

The correlation between TLRY and CGC is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2018

0.70

The correlation between TLRY and CGC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

EPS

TLRY:

-$25.09

CGC:

-CA$1.23

PS Ratio

TLRY:

0.30

CGC:

1.28

Total Revenue (TTM)

TLRY:

$1.11B

CGC:

CA$312.34M

Gross Profit (TTM)

TLRY:

$307.02M

CGC:

CA$77.66M

EBITDA (TTM)

TLRY:

-$1.84B

CGC:

-CA$205.34M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TLRY vs. CGC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TLRY
TLRY Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
TLRY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLRY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLRY Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
TLRY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLRY Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

CGC
CGC Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
CGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGC Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
CGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGC Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLRY vs. CGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tilray, Inc. (TLRY) and Canopy Growth Corporation (CGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TLRYCGCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.05

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.36

-0.37

+0.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.54

-0.58

+1.12

TLRY vs. CGC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLRY Sharpe Ratio is 0.21, which is higher than the CGC Sharpe Ratio of -0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLRY and CGC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TLRY vs. CGC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLRY drawdown since its inception was -99.83%, roughly equal to the maximum CGC drawdown of -99.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLRY and CGC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TLRYCGCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.83%

-99.85%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-78.14%

-55.38%

-22.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-89.12%

-95.10%

+5.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-98.07%

-99.67%

+1.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.78%

-99.83%

+0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-91.41%

-62.22%

-29.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

51.97%

35.51%

+16.46%

Volatility

TLRY vs. CGC - Volatility Comparison

Tilray, Inc. (TLRY) has a higher volatility of 11.71% compared to Canopy Growth Corporation (CGC) at 8.31%. This indicates that TLRY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TLRYCGCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.71%

8.31%

+3.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.86%

46.40%

-4.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

130.78%

103.10%

+27.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

94.88%

124.27%

-29.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

111.70%

103.39%

+8.31%

Dividends

TLRY vs. CGC - Dividend Comparison

Neither TLRY nor CGC has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

TLRY vs. CGC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Tilray, Inc. and Canopy Growth Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M300.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
206.73M
71.25M
(TLRY) Total Revenue
(CGC) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. TLRY values in USD, CGC values in CAD

Frequently Asked Questions


TLRY and CGC have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TLRY has higher volatility (11.71%) compared to CGC (8.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLRY dropped -99.83% vs CGC's -99.85%.

TLRY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.21 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TLRY and CGC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer